25-04-2021, 09:30
|
#16
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 310
|
Re: City Fibre
I see why they won't do it, I was just asserting that they won't.
If Cityfibre actually complete all the towns they have planned, they will also be a genuinely national provider.
|
|
|
25-04-2021, 09:50
|
#17
|
Architect of Ideas
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,392
|
Re: City Fibre
Hopefully alt nets drive coverage and competition.
As you say if one becomes national (or the sum of them does) then it represents competition at a national level.
As Pierre pointed out earlier though as it’s cost prohibitive to deploy the challenge is if there’s someone already there (FTTP or Virgin) and you are fighting over market share from Day 1 it’s often more appealing to go elsewhere.
|
|
|
25-04-2021, 10:11
|
#18
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 310
|
Re: City Fibre
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Hopefully alt nets drive coverage and competition.
As you say if one becomes national (or the sum of them does) then it represents competition at a national level.
As Pierre pointed out earlier though as it’s cost prohibitive to deploy the challenge is if there’s someone already there (FTTP or Virgin) and you are fighting over market share from Day 1 it’s often more appealing to go elsewhere.
|
Yeah, you'd definitely think that, yet neither Cityfibre (who are going hard on their deployment), or others like toob in Southampton seem to consider VM competition.
I guess they are planning on significantly undercutting them, with a product that can easily be scaled to XS-GPON and beyond for little additional cost (no need to replace any cables etc, unlike the work VM have to do for node splits).
I mean, 20x the upload for more than 1/3rd less than Gig1, with much better latency than DOCSIS can achieve? Hell, in the case of toob it's £25/m to £64/m from VM. You'd be a fool not to switch.
VM can of course do GPON over their fibre in RFoG areas, it can coexist with DOCSIS, but that raises the "national product" issue again.
That said I've heard that CF are not achieving the level of penetration they hoped for. Personally I think this is at least partly down to lack of hype/advertisement. Most people here in Ipswich don't even know they exist or are rolling out.
|
|
|
25-04-2021, 19:20
|
#19
|
The Dark Satanic Mills
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 12,053
|
Re: City Fibre
Quote:
Originally Posted by rtho782
Yeah, you'd definitely think that, yet neither Cityfibre (who are going hard on their deployment), or others like toob in Southampton seem to consider VM competition.
I guess they are planning on significantly undercutting them, with a product that can easily be scaled to XS-GPON and beyond for little additional cost (no need to replace any cables etc, unlike the work VM have to do for node splits).
I mean, 20x the upload for more than 1/3rd less than Gig1, with much better latency than DOCSIS can achieve? Hell, in the case of toob it's £25/m to £64/m from VM. You'd be a fool not to switch.
VM can of course do GPON over their fibre in RFoG areas, it can coexist with DOCSIS, but that raises the "national product" issue again.
That said I've heard that CF are not achieving the level of penetration they hoped for. Personally I think this is at least partly down to lack of hype/advertisement. Most people here in Ipswich don't even know they exist or are rolling out.
|
VM are going to overbuild their HFC network with fibre, and the two networks will operate in tandem. Those happy with what they’re getting can stay on HFC, higher users can transfer to fibre, thereby easing the demands on the HFC. This will start either late this year or early next.
And yes, replacing RFoG with XGPoN is very much in development and will be deployed as soon as.
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
|
|
|
25-04-2021, 21:00
|
#20
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 310
|
Re: City Fibre
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
VM are going to overbuild their HFC network with fibre, and the two networks will operate in tandem... This will start either late this year or early next.
|
Interesting, I assume you work for VM? This sounds like a long term project that will take a long time to complete, as it's most of the way to deploying a new network, unless VM have a lot of spare duct space, but this is one of those things that probably varies heavily by area, and which cable company built it in the 80s/90s.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
And yes, replacing RFoG with XGPoN is very much in development and will be deployed as soon as.
|
I mean it's less in development and more there are already commercial off the shelf solutions for it, it's just WDM which is already used to increase density in RFoG areas, except another frequency for GPON/XGPON.
|
|
|
26-04-2021, 07:03
|
#21
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,386
|
Re: City Fibre
Quote:
Originally Posted by rtho782
Interesting, I assume you work for VM? This sounds like a long term project that will take a long time to complete, as it's most of the way to deploying a new network, unless VM have a lot of spare duct space, but this is one of those things that probably varies heavily by area, and which cable company built it in the 80s/90s.
I mean it's less in development and more there are already commercial off the shelf solutions for it, it's just WDM which is already used to increase density in RFoG areas, except another frequency for GPON/XGPON.
|
Fibre is smaller than coax, They would probably use the old cable to draw the fibre through
|
|
|
26-04-2021, 12:02
|
#22
|
Architect of Ideas
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,392
|
Re: City Fibre
Pierre - have VM said anything publicly on overbuild?
Not disputing your posts here - 100% sure you are correct. I'd be quite interested to read more if in public domain just out of curiousity.
|
|
|
26-04-2021, 15:29
|
#23
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 310
|
Re: City Fibre
Quote:
Originally Posted by jb66
Fibre is smaller than coax, They would probably use the old cable to draw the fibre through
|
That works if it's replacement, less so if it's operating in tandem as the guy I replied to suggested. Also doesn't work for direct buried cables, as certainly the last few meters per customer usually are.
|
|
|
26-04-2021, 16:03
|
#24
|
The Dark Satanic Mills
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 12,053
|
Re: City Fibre
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Pierre - have VM said anything publicly on overbuild?
Not disputing your posts here - 100% sure you are correct. I'd be quite interested to read more if in public domain just out of curiousity.
|
No, and it's unlikely they will until the build is well underway and dates for releasing areas have been confirmed. Trust me it's happening, I know what the project is called.
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
|
|
|
26-04-2021, 19:30
|
#25
|
Architect of Ideas
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,392
|
Re: City Fibre
As I said, wasn’t disputing it will be interesting to read about it when they go public.
|
|
|
28-04-2021, 19:43
|
#26
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Coventry
Services: Vodafone/City Fibre Gigafast 900
Posts: 1,781
|
Re: City Fibre
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
VM are going to overbuild their HFC network with fibre, and the two networks will operate in tandem. Those happy with what they’re getting can stay on HFC, higher users can transfer to fibre, thereby easing the demands on the HFC. This will start either late this year or early next.
And yes, replacing RFoG with XGPoN is very much in development and will be deployed as soon as.
|
Interesting.
In my streets in Coventry we have the old NTL network, but a few streets away, where VM previously had nothing, they have installed FTTP as part of their new Coventry South network. VM doesn't offer these customers any products different to what they offer on NTL cable. FTTP hasn't been fully exploited. So, at what point do VM offer a full symmetrical service on their new fibre and on the fibre over-building existing cable? Is the answer to this question more to do with VM's network architecture than fibre or cable?
__________________
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Coventry
Services: FACTCO/CityFibre 1GB FTTP; Asus GT-AX11000 +3 iMesh nodes; Humax 2Tb TV boxes x2; Synology DS920+ used as Plex server
|
|
|
28-04-2021, 19:46
|
#27
|
Sad Doig Fan!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Barry South Wales
Age: 68
Services: With VM for BB 250Mb service.(Deal)
Posts: 11,666
|
Re: City Fibre
VM's network architecture
|
|
|
28-04-2021, 19:53
|
#28
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 310
|
Re: City Fibre
Quote:
Originally Posted by roughbeast
Interesting.
In my streets in Coventry we have the old NTL network, but a few streets away, where VM previously had nothing, they have installed FTTP as part of their new Coventry South network. VM doesn't offer these customers any products different to what they offer on NTL cable. FTTP hasn't been fully exploited. So, at what point do VM offer a full symmetrical service on their new fibre and on the fibre over-building existing cable? Is the answer to this question more to do with VM's network architecture than fibre or cable?
|
Because right now they use rfog, which means it's the same docsis system with zero advantages from a customer perspective, although from VM's perspective it's cheaper to maintain, doesn't need power, fibre is cheaper, and the runs can be a lot longer.
They can do gpon and rfog (for TV etc) over the same fibre with wdm, but they don't want to do that yet as they want one range of products nationwide.
|
|
|
28-04-2021, 21:47
|
#29
|
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 36,958
|
Re: City Fibre
Sorry ... groupon and frogs and what the what now?
Anyone got a helpful glossary to hand here? This all sounds like it ought to be interesting, if only I could follow it...
|
|
|
28-04-2021, 22:18
|
#30
|
The Dark Satanic Mills
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 12,053
|
Re: City Fibre
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Sorry ... groupon and frogs and what the what now?
Anyone got a helpful glossary to hand here? This all sounds like it ought to be interesting, if only I could follow it...
|
RFoG, Radio Frequency over Glass.
Disappointingly turns an Optical Fibre into a Coax, but without the losses.
It meant that VM could roll out a full fibre network but deliver the exact same services as it’s HFC network (with the exact same limitations) but not need to change any of the back office systems and headend kit.
Because the FTTP network is passive, it doesn’t matter what you put over it. RFoG today, tomorrow XGS-PON. XGS-PON was always the end game and still is.
The HFC will get you to 10G, and probably beyond but it is estimated it will be at end of life between 2035-2040. So a fibre overbuild will be required.
There is a lot of work to be done with the backbone Access network architecture before you get to the delivery.
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:56.
|