Police to get tough on internet trolls. - Page 123

**Paul** · 28-07-2022, 02:26

So, I'm curious now - what reputation are they damaging ?

RichardCoulter · 28-07-2022, 03:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul

So, I'm curious now - what reputation are they damaging ?

I can't go into any grest detail about the case whilst legal proceedings are ongoing, but let's just say that the false allegations were highly offensive.

---------- Post added at 03:50 ---------- Previous post was at 03:45 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter

Psychologists urge the Government to make class a protected characteristic under the Equality Act:

https://www.newstatesman.com/society...bery-be-banned

If successful, terms such as Toff, Chav etc would no longer be permitted.

This was the subject of discussion on last night's Moral Maze:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0019k7d

Mythica · 28-07-2022, 05:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter

I can't go into any grest detail about the case whilst legal proceedings are ongoing, but let's just say that the false allegations were highly offensive.

---------- Post added at 03:50 ---------- Previous post was at 03:45 ----------

This was the subject of discussion on last night's Moral Maze:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0019k7d

Just the same as the false allegations you made then tried to sweep under the carpet when I pressed you to prove it.

**Mick** · 28-07-2022, 06:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mythica

Just the same as the false allegations you made then tried to sweep under the carpet when I pressed you to prove it.

I’ve told you two (You and Richard) before, to keep whatever legal dispute or feud you have with one another, off this forum.

Mythica · 28-07-2022, 06:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick

I’ve told you two (You and Richard) before, to keep whatever legal dispute or feud you have with one another, off this forum.

It happened on this forum.

**Mick** · 28-07-2022, 06:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mythica

It happened on this forum.

I don’t care. I won’t have it used as some petty legal squabbling you have with someone, keep it off this forum.

Mythica · 28-07-2022, 07:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick

I don’t care. I won’t have it used as some petty legal squabbling you have with someone, keep it off this forum.

I dont have anything legal going on? I'm pointing out the hypocrisy in Richards posts about his legal case when he has done exactly the same thing himself. Is that not what the topic is about, internet trolls?

**Mick** · 28-07-2022, 07:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mythica

I dont have anything legal going on? I'm pointing out the hypocrisy in Richards posts about his legal case when he has done exactly the same thing himself. Is that not what the topic is about, internet trolls?

No the topic is not about you and him and his case against you.

It’s also not going to be you arguing with me about it. I’ve given you and him an instruction, it still stands and it’s non-negotiable.

Mythica · 28-07-2022, 07:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick

No the topic is not about you and him and his case against you.

It’s also not going to be you arguing with me about it. I’ve given you and him an instruction, it still stands and it’s non-negotiable.

Let's just get this clear, he doesn't and never has had a case against me. I'm not sure where you have got that from.

If the instruction stands, that's fine, but im not sure why I can't point out the hypocrisy of someone who is very vocal on these things.

peanut · 28-07-2022, 08:22

If there is a good enough reason to why this bill should be scrapped is what is stopping the likes of people like someone we know on here that will go to lengths (troll) to provoke the responses needed for people like him to then take legal actions as if it is their goal to do so. So turning the tables so it's the trolls that are the ones that can gain from this.

**Paul** · 28-07-2022, 13:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mythica

but im not sure why I can't point out the hypocrisy of someone who is very vocal on these things.

You could, and have bought it up, multiple times, in different topics.
Continuing to bring it up again and again [and again] is serving no purpose now.

Mythica · 28-07-2022, 13:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul

You could, and have bought it up, multiple times, in different topics.
Continuing to bring it up again and again [and again] is serving no purpose now.

I'm not sure what topics? This seemed the perfect topic of Internet trolls based on what he was saying.

You could say the same for Richard himself always bringing the conversation round to him and the constant battles he's got going on, but week in week out, it's always some legal case or complaint. Is it not fair to remind him he's done the exact thing he's complaining about?

**Paul** · 28-07-2022, 13:19

Enough, this isnt a discussion, its a directive from the Admins. Take a break from this topic, and move on.

RichardCoulter · 28-07-2022, 16:08

Can the police keep us safe? is a series on Radio 4. This mornings episode explained that more and more crime is taking place online and that some websites are reluctant to pass on details to the police, which the Online Safety Bill hopes to improve:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0019kjp

Quote:

In the final part of this series, Helena and Rob investigate the realm of online and cyber crime, which poses huge difficulties for policing. They explore the police’s role in public order and how the idea of the prevention of harms - responsibility and care within communities rather than reactive policing - might transform public safety.

RichardCoulter · 28-07-2022, 18:35

Online harrassment also affects forum owners too.

This site is closing down because it actually started to affect the mental health of the owner (which is presumably the aim of such odious people who post such rude/nasty/negative things).

https://tvliveforum.com/showthread.php?tid=1271

We have to stand against them.

Courtesy of epsilon.