Boxnation, Why not a Wrestling Channel
27-11-2011, 22:57
|
#1
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,798
|
Boxnation, Why not a Wrestling Channel
Now we have a boxing channel available on the system, why doesn't VM go for a British Wrestling channel.
We have all this 'fixed' American stuff, l am certain around the British Isle's we must have British Wrestling.
If that came in, it would be great, especially from the World of Sport days.
|
|
|
28-11-2011, 08:05
|
#2
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Leeds
Age: 53
Services: XXL customer with movies and sport +HD And now TiVo.
Posts: 657
|
Re: Boxnation, Why not a Wrestling Channel
There was a wrestling channel showing World of sport matches a few years ago but it was on sky only, I know that WWE are launching a channel in america next year.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWE_Network
|
|
|
28-11-2011, 08:34
|
#3
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Up here
Posts: 36,604
|
Re: Boxnation, Why not a Wrestling Channel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu
Now we have a boxing channel available on the system, why doesn't VM go for a British Wrestling channel.
We have all this 'fixed' American stuff, l am certain around the British Isle's we must have British Wrestling.
If that came in, it would be great, especially from the World of Sport days.
|
*Cracks knuckles*
Right, let me get my teeth in to this one.
There used to be a channel called TWC - The Wrestling Channel. It didn't work out as there simply wasn't enough money in it. It primarily featured LDN wrestling, run by a friend of mine called Sanjay Bagga and they do shows around the London and Essex areas. Sanjay is considered by many to be the most successful UK promoter in the south of the country. If he wasn't able to put on a sustainable product then I can't think of many others that could.
The problem with British-based wrestling is there's a LOT of crap out there. Legendary promoter Jim Cornette once said "There's only 2 types of wrestling, good wrestling and bad wrestling".
Right now all you need to run a show is to hire a ring (usually around £150) and possibly about £50 to pay your 'talent'. many noobs will be willing to work for free just to be on a show. A lot of venues are Social Clubs and the like which won't ask to see insurance - lucky, because liability cover for the workers and audience is usually £1000+. Usually they don't charge to hire the hall, they just make money from the bar. As a result any Tom, Dick and Harry can put on a 'wrestling' show and it leads to what is often an embarrassing show which exposes so many of the secrets of wrestling. Yes we know you're aware it's not real but we want to put on a performance which is so good you're happy to suspend your disbelief for the duration of the event. With all the rubbish out there, it's very frustrating.
There are a handful of top quality promoters in the UK who ensure their product is the best - Brian Dixon, Alan Ravenhill to name just 2. But TV is too much of a risk for it to be sustainable. The target audience is kids, and they just want to see huge muscular blokes who are well over and have a great hook/gimmick. The problem is as soon as any UK workers get like that, they get head-hunted by WWE or TNA.
Arthur, there is a thriving British wrestling scene (check the second link in my sig). I used to wrestle and am now a referee and have been for 5 years. All pro wrestling is 'fixed' as you call it. There is no real distinction between what you call 'American' wrestling and the old World of Sport product. The results are pre-determined and the moves are 'worked'. the only real difference is the presentation. The American stuff (and about 99% of what you see anywhere in the UK right now) is just more flashy and 'show'. The old WoS rules system (8x3 minute rounds etc) simply would not work right now, the market has moved on.
I've reffed a few WoS-rules matches which were featured as one-offs on shows and they're an interesting novelty but the vast majority of the target audience have never heard of it and have no long-term interest in it.
|
|
|
28-11-2011, 12:22
|
#4
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,798
|
Re: Boxnation, Why not a Wrestling Channel
cheers Russ for that, British wrestling used to be on a Saturday afternoon, but to me the sad part of American crap is this raza ma tazz that goes with it and this to me ruins the whole point of watching it.
I remember the days of Big Daddy, Fal Finley and Kendo Nackersacky. good pros, but you don't have that anymore.
|
|
|
28-11-2011, 12:30
|
#5
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Radio Cairo, Hampstead, London
Services: 100 MB Broadband, XL Tv, Sky Sports and Movies HD, all other prenium channels, 3 TIVO, 2 V HD
Posts: 2,937
|
Re: Boxnation, Why not a Wrestling Channel
I think Sky would launch a wrestling channel, they already own the UK rights to WWE events (if they would be bothered)
|
|
|
28-11-2011, 12:34
|
#6
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Up here
Posts: 36,604
|
Re: Boxnation, Why not a Wrestling Channel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu
cheers Russ for that, British wrestling used to be on a Saturday afternoon, but to me the sad part of American crap is this raza ma tazz that goes with it and this to me ruins the whole point of watching it.
I remember the days of Big Daddy, Fal Finley and Kendo Nackersacky. good pros, but you don't have that anymore.
|
Fit Finley, until recently, worked for WWE and is expected to return in the near future.
The 'American' style is pretty much standard all over the UK now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Fry
I think Sky would launch a wrestling channel, they already own the UK rights to WWE events (if they would be bothered)
|
They did, it was called The Wrestling Channel.
|
|
|
28-11-2011, 12:35
|
#7
|
Guest
Location: Essex
Services: vm broadband tvxl TiVo, v+ sky sports and phone.
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Boxnation, Why not a Wrestling Channel
Yes i agree a Wrestling channel,if only we could bring back Giant Haystacks,Big Daddy,Jim Breaks,Kendo nagasaki,and commentator Kent Walton i might subscribe.
|
|
|
28-11-2011, 12:36
|
#8
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Leeds
Age: 53
Services: XXL customer with movies and sport +HD And now TiVo.
Posts: 657
|
Re: Boxnation, Why not a Wrestling Channel
Quote:
Originally Posted by richard1960
Yes i agree a Wrestling channel,if only we could bring back Giant Haystacks,Big Daddy,Jim Breaks,Kendo nagasaki,and commentator Kent Walton i might subscribe.
|
They would do well, 3 are dead to my knowledge.
|
|
|
28-11-2011, 12:38
|
#9
|
Still alive and fighting
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In the land of beyond and beyond.
Services: XL BB, 3 360 boxes , XL TV.
Posts: 56,402
|
Re: Boxnation, Why not a Wrestling Channel
Quote:
Originally Posted by richard1960
Yes i agree a Wrestling channel,if only we could bring back Giant Haystacks,Big Daddy,Jim Breaks,Kendo nagasaki,and commentator Kent Walton i might subscribe.
|
Yes l remember watching these grand old names of wrestling when l was much younger with my dad and it was great watching them on a saturday on ITV.
__________________
“The only lesson you can learn from history is that it repeats itself”
|
|
|
28-11-2011, 12:41
|
#10
|
Guest
Location: Essex
Services: vm broadband tvxl TiVo, v+ sky sports and phone.
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Boxnation, Why not a Wrestling Channel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingofthedead4
They would do well, 3 are dead to my knowledge.
|
Yes you are right sadly 3 i think re no longer here, jim breaks and kendo nagasaki are still with us.
I liked the uk wrestling much less razz matazz bull then the us stuff.
|
|
|
28-11-2011, 12:44
|
#11
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Up here
Posts: 36,604
|
Re: Boxnation, Why not a Wrestling Channel
Quote:
Originally Posted by richard1960
Yes you are right sadly 3 i think re no longer here, jim breaks and kendo nagasaki are still with us.
I liked the uk wrestling much less razz matazz bull then the us stuff.
|
The problem is there's no market for the UK style. Again, the target audience is kids and WWE/TNA is all they know.
If they relaunched The Wrestling Channel and featured WoS rules matches there would be very little interest in it.
|
|
|
28-11-2011, 12:44
|
#12
|
Guest
Location: Essex
Services: vm broadband tvxl TiVo, v+ sky sports and phone.
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Boxnation, Why not a Wrestling Channel
Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone
Yes l remember watching these grand old names of wrestling when l was much younger with my dad and it was great watching them on a saturday on ITV.
|
Yes your right denphone,saturday afternoon with Kent Walton commentating,and lots of ladies in the front rows clutching their handbags,whilst shouting loudly and jumping up and even sometimes landing a handbagging to Giant Haystacks or Big Daddy ,classic stuff.
|
|
|
28-11-2011, 12:45
|
#13
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Leeds
Age: 53
Services: XXL customer with movies and sport +HD And now TiVo.
Posts: 657
|
Re: Boxnation, Why not a Wrestling Channel
I wonder if seen as sky have dropped PPV Boxing, if WWE might do the same thing?
|
|
|
28-11-2011, 12:47
|
#14
|
Guest
Location: Essex
Services: vm broadband tvxl TiVo, v+ sky sports and phone.
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Boxnation, Why not a Wrestling Channel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
The problem is there's no market for the UK style. Again, the target audience is kids and WWE/TNA is all they know.
If they relaunched The Wrestling Channel and featured WoS rules matches there would be very little interest in it.
|
Not so sure Russ the baby boomber generation is a large target audience you know,when i get to retire the generations will be tipped towards us.
But Yeah you are right todays kids like the amercan stuff with added bull.
|
|
|
28-11-2011, 12:48
|
#15
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Up here
Posts: 36,604
|
Re: Boxnation, Why not a Wrestling Channel
Quote:
Originally Posted by richard1960
Not so sure the baby boomber generation is a large target audience you know,when i get to retire the generation will be tipped towards us.
|
Every show I've ever worked at, the vast majority of the audience has been kids.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:18.
|