Trump’s Troubles

[Mr K]

Originally Posted by Mick

The Biden Administration is the most corrupt ever, & most useless, homelessness up tenfold, migrants sleeping on street corners, some absolute shit holes, mostly in Democrat run States. But Trump man bad & derangement syndrome strikes again.

Yes, derangement syndrome certainly has struck again

Originally Posted by Mick

Innocent until proven guilty. So you support a Putin style lock up of your opponents, because he’s high up in the polls. Why didn’t they (Pathetic Biden Administration) indict him two years ago at the time?

Trump didn’t storm the Capitol building and he’s on video at the time telling everyone to go home & respect law & order.

The Biden Administration is the most corrupt ever, & most useless, homelessness up tenfold, migrants sleeping on street corners, some absolute shit holes, mostly in Democrat run States. But Trump man bad & derangement syndrome strikes again.

Homelessness up 0.3%…

https://endhomelessness.org/homeless...-homelessness/

Homelessness rose by a modest 0.3 percent from 2020 to 2022, a period marked by both pandemic-related economic disruptions and robust investments of federal resources into human services.

[Pierre]

Originally Posted by Hugh

Homelessness up 0.3%…

https://endhomelessness.org/homeless...-homelessness/

I wouldn’t die on the hill of those numbers, I don’t think there is a real accurate assessment of the issue given:-

In the US, the number of homeless people is calculated by the Department of Housing and Urban Development by counting people on the street and in homeless shelters—but they do this only one night in January per year. In 2020, that number was 580,466.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/judysto...h=103668a08998

Originally Posted by Russ

No Mick I support the locking up of criminals.

If Biden can be proven to have committed a crime then yes he needs locking up too.

But I’m pretty certain that won’t happen. For all his faults he’s not the career criminal Trump is.

You’re still jumping ahead, you’re not a criminal until convicted. It’s still innocent until proven guilty.

I seem to remember a lot of people shouting "lock her up" - not much "due process" then…

[Russ]

Originally Posted by Mick

You’re still jumping ahead, you’re not a criminal until convicted. It’s still innocent until proven guilty.

I know I’m jumping ahead, most people form an opinion of someone’s guilt (or lack of) before the jury has their say. It just so happens that I’ve read a lot of information about his apparent business “practices” that lead me to believe he’s no stranger to trashing laws that get in his way.

Add in the fact that he comes across as an absolute simpleton who craves being seen as a benevolent genius, as well as coming across as a thoroughly unlikeable and unpleasant human to me then yeah, I’ve already decided he’s guilty.

However I’m afforded that right as I’m not on his jury.

Originally Posted by Russ

I know I’m jumping ahead, most people form an opinion of someone’s guilt (or lack of) before the jury has their say. It just so happens that I’ve read a lot of information about his apparent business “practices” that lead me to believe he’s no stranger to trashing laws that get in his way.

Add in the fact that he comes across as an absolute simpleton who craves being seen as a benevolent genius, as well as coming across as a thoroughly unlikeable and unpleasant human to me then yeah, I’ve already decided he’s guilty.

However I’m afforded that right as I’m not on his jury.

Haters are gonna hate; which is all irrelevant in the grand scheme of things, as is your derangement syndrome on Trump. The stupid Biden Administration has weaponised the Department of Justice, Merrick Garland, Atorney General of the United States, needs to be impeached for gross interference in an election cycle of Biden’s main rival, Trump & trampling over Trumps 1st Amendment Rights to Free speech which the Constitution affords him that lawful right.

In 2017, just before Trump took the oath of office, several Democrat House of Representatives, tried to halt and stop the certification of Donald Trump’s presidency, they too now need to be indicted for trying to overturn the electoral votes.

---------- Post added at 08:12 ---------- Previous post was at 08:08 ----------

Originally Posted by Hugh

I seem to remember a lot of people shouting "lock her up" - not much "due process" then…

Well, she did actually violate the law on storage of classified material, she should have been indicted, but because there was rogue players in the FBI, i.e Democrat supporting idiots, she got off Scot free. Thankfully, it ruined her presidency hopes.

[Russ]

And potatoes are going to potate.

Isn’t calling someone “deranged” a personal attack? I don’t ever recall personally attacking you for an opinion I disagreed with Mick.

You need to step back from your black/white view of this Mick. Just because I take a dim view of former President Pigshit does not mean I’m a fan of Biden. I’m not a fan of either and why would I? They’re not my presidents.

If Biden can be proven to have broken the law then by all means put him on trial. It happened to Bill Clinton.

The problem now is there’s too much evidence (notice I didn’t say “proof” - there’s a difference, I work in Law and deal with similar matters) to indicate Trump has gone against their laws and constitution.

If the similar crops up for Biden then I look forward to his day in court.

Mick I don’t have a dog in this fight and neither do you. We’re allowed opinions though.

[1andrew1]

Originally Posted by Mick

It’s still innocent until proven guilty.

Except for Merrick Garland who you think should be impeached?

Originally Posted by Mick

Haters are gonna hate; which is all irrelevant in the grand scheme of things, as is your derangement syndrome on Trump. The stupid Biden Administration has weaponised the Department of Justice, Merrick Garland, Atorney General of the United States, needs to be impeached for gross interference in an election cycle of Biden’s main rival, Trump & trampling over Trumps 1st Amendment Rights to Free speech which the Constitution affords him that lawful right.

In 2017, just before Trump took the oath of office, several Democrat House of Representatives, tried to halt and stop the certification of Donald Trump’s presidency, they too now need to be indicted for trying to overturn the electoral votes.

---------- Post added at 08:12 ---------- Previous post was at 08:08 ----------



Well, she did actually violate the law on storage of classified material, she should have been indicted, but because there was rogue players in the FBI, i.e Democrat supporting idiots, she got off Scot free. Thankfully, it ruined her presidency hopes.

Originally Posted by Mick

You’re still jumping ahead, you’re not a criminal until convicted. It’s still innocent until proven guilty.

Also…

[Russ]

Derangement syndrome on Hunter Biden there perhaps?

[TheDaddy]

I'd have thought the fact this whole mess is of his own making would be enough to disqualify him from the process in most peoples minds, the fact it doesn't and hasn't is the derangement syndrome as far as I'm concerned

[Russ]

Intimidating witnesses now? I’ll tell you who is deranged. Donald J Trump.

Yet his Trumpanzees still want him in charge of their country.

[TheDaddy]

Originally Posted by Russ

Intimidating witnesses now? I’ll tell you who is deranged. Donald J Trump.

Yet his Trumpanzees still want him in charge of their country.

It's a delightful campaign slogan, right up there with ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country and the only thing you have to fear is fear itself, nothing like threats to unify the country

[punkrock101]

I wonder what would happen if Trump gets jailed then somehow wins the election, I personally think if you have any criminal charges you should disqualified from public office regardless if you are incarcerated or not.