You are here: Home | Forum | Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.
Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
Yes - giving legal advice against the British government whilst serving as an MP is treason in my book.
IDS chairing a committee that makes decisions that impact an organisation he works for is corruption.
Funny how many jobs in the real world for far less money than MPs' salaries are exclusive contracts so you can't work for anyone else. Yet for those who govern us, such rules don't apply.
The one group whom I don't think should be able to take a second job are the police.However I don't mind the fact that they can because they have to run it past their superiors and frankly the salary they recieve are truly peanuts compared to our representatives in Parliament.I really don't think that public servants should be able to take on second paid job that may cause conflict in their main job.
__________________ Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
Services: VM 500M SH3 thingy
in modem mode
XL TV V6 Sony Bravia smart TV and M phone
Posts: 11,000
Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
We need poor people for the people slightly better off than them to look down at though.
__________________
History is much like an endless waltz: The three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever.
However history will change with my coronation - Mariemaia Khushrenada
Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carth
In this day and age, nobody - from the top to the bottom - should need a second job.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
We need poor people for the people slightly better off than them to look down at though.
And to blame for why their life isn't better, I find it one of life's oddities that we seek to blame those beneath us rather than look up to those above us who actually exert some influence upon us, perhaps that's due to the old class system or just the human predilection to blame someone, it can't just be fate, luck or worse still a bit of personal responsibility in the blame game
Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
Well the next election is a pass for me the corruption and sleaze in this current Tory party makes it impossible for me to vote for them and even if they got rid of boris the buffoon it isn't enough. From dubious 2nd jobs to the awarding of contracts the Johnson government has looked more like a friends beneficiary organisation then a real government but as bad as they are I couldn't vote for labour. We really are running out of options and given the way things are going retirement can't come soon enough.
Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackshep
Well the next election is a pass for me the corruption and sleaze in this current Tory party makes it impossible for me to vote for them and even if they got rid of boris the buffoon it isn't enough. From dubious 2nd jobs to the awarding of contracts the Johnson government has looked more like a friends beneficiary organisation then a real government but as bad as they are I couldn't vote for labour. We really are running out of options and given the way things are going retirement can't come soon enough.
They hate pensioners so be careful what you wish for.
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carth
In this day and age, nobody - from the top to the bottom - should need a second job.
As well as my main job in Law I’m also a wrestling referee and ring announcer, both of which I get paid for. Nothing I’m ever going to retire on but enough to get me through January when I’m always skint after Christmas.
Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
As well as my main job in Law I’m also a wrestling referee and ring announcer, both of which I get paid for. Nothing I’m ever going to retire on but enough to get me through January when I’m always skint after Christmas.
Why shouldn’t I have those extra jobs?
Would you need additional jobs if you were paid £80k+ and had a renumeration "package" work hundreds of thousands more? I took his point to be that no one's wage for a full time job should leave them in a position where they need to take on a part time job just to get by, which incidentally you don't by the sound of it, you want nice Christmas' without getting into debt which is fair enough but hardly the same as choosing whether to eat or pay full rent
Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
Sleaze is just corruption with a good accountant and lawyer…
__________________ There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it. If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul
Either you are really clueless, or just trolling for a reaction.
Plenty of people need a second job in order to earn reasonable money, and not rely on handouts.
Just becasue the UK average is £30K does not mean everyone gets it.
In fairness he said “should”. The economy shouldn’t be structured in such a way two people need to work for peanuts (and be supplemented by the taxpayer) to keep a roof over their head and pay the bills.
However everyone jumped on the bandwagon, mortgaged themselves up to their combined eyeballs, pushed house prices up and aren’t genuinely better off for it.