The BBC charter renewal process begins
11-11-2020, 09:08
|
#31
|
The Invisible Woman
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: between Portsmouth and Southampton.
Age: 71
Services: VM XL TV,50 MB VM BB,VM landline, Tivo
Posts: 40,190
|
Re: Netflix/Streaming Services
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Accepting for the sake of argument that the BBC’s Royal Charter is not renewed in 2032, the organisation becomes a commercial broadcaster, free to choose how it raises revenue, and its public service obligation is reduced but not entirely withdrawn, then they could pursue the strategy you’ve outlined. I’d have thought it very unlikely that the public service obligation would be withdrawn from BBC1 and 2. That being the case they would still not be able to put these behind a paywall.
If you look at ITV as the BBC’s nearest analogy on terrestrial TV, only the main channel in epg position 3 is a public service channel that must be free to air. Yet ITV 2, 3 and 4, which are not public service channels, are also FTA. Their HD variants are behind Sky’s paywall on satellite but this has more to do with Sky’s willingness to pay broadcasters to keep HD channels off Freesat than any deliberate strategy to ‘sell’ their channels (Film 4 is paywalled on Sky for the same reason).
So while you could see a scenario where the BBC’s more niche stuff could be paywalled (and the public service obligation on those channels were withdrawn then they would be free to do that), the example of ITV suggests they wouldn’t. Also consider that all of the BBC’s output is geared towards mass audiences. Even the niche stuff on BBC4 is intended for that entire market segment, and not just those within that segment that are prepared to take out a subscription to Sky or VM. At least a third of the potential audience for BBC4 live in homes that don’t already have a pay tv service is significant. If they don’t have Sky already, are they likely to go and get it for BBC4? I’d say it’s unlikely.
Furthermore, at present every one of the BBC’s channels is designed around a public service requirement, and not a commercial one. So despite all of the above, it is unlikely that any of the BBC’s channels would continue in precisely the same form, in a commercial environment and without the public service obligation.
---------- Post added at 08:41 ---------- Previous post was at 08:07 ----------
These posts were split out of the Netflix/streaming services thread. Please continue discussion about the TV licence and the BBC Royal Charter renewal process here.
|
__________________
Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
|
|
|
11-11-2020, 10:37
|
#32
|
Rise above the players
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,622
|
Re: Netflix/Streaming Services
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Accepting for the sake of argument that the BBC’s Royal Charter is not renewed in 2032, the organisation becomes a commercial broadcaster, free to choose how it raises revenue, and its public service obligation is reduced but not entirely withdrawn, then they could pursue the strategy you’ve outlined. I’d have thought it very unlikely that the public service obligation would be withdrawn from BBC1 and 2. That being the case they would still not be able to put these behind a paywall.
If you look at ITV as the BBC’s nearest analogy on terrestrial TV, only the main channel in epg position 3 is a public service channel that must be free to air. Yet ITV 2, 3 and 4, which are not public service channels, are also FTA. Their HD variants are behind Sky’s paywall on satellite but this has more to do with Sky’s willingness to pay broadcasters to keep HD channels off Freesat than any deliberate strategy to ‘sell’ their channels (Film 4 is paywalled on Sky for the same reason).
So while you could see a scenario where the BBC’s more niche stuff could be paywalled (and the public service obligation on those channels were withdrawn then they would be free to do that), the example of ITV suggests they wouldn’t. Also consider that all of the BBC’s output is geared towards mass audiences. Even the niche stuff on BBC4 is intended for that entire market segment, and not just those within that segment that are prepared to take out a subscription to Sky or VM. At least a third of the potential audience for BBC4 live in homes that don’t already have a pay tv service is significant. If they don’t have Sky already, are they likely to go and get it for BBC4? I’d say it’s unlikely.
Furthermore, at present every one of the BBC’s channels is designed around a public service requirement, and not a commercial one. So despite all of the above, it is unlikely that any of the BBC’s channels would continue in precisely the same form, in a commercial environment and without the public service obligation.[COLOR="Silver"]
|
I agree with your description of the present situation.
Where we disagree is that you have a presumption that this situation will remain as it is. You will be aware from my previous post that a review is to be conducted on the future of public service broadcasting, and whether we actually need this at all in this day and age. This is what you seem to be failing to address.
You rightly refer to the charter, but this could be terminated, either when it is up for renewal, or at an earlier date if the government so decides.
If it is decided to continue with the public service obligation, there are a number of points I should make.
Firstly, there is no guarantee that this obligation will remain with the BBC at all, particularly in view of the current government’s antipathy towards the Corporation.
Secondly, whether or not the government will look more favourably on the Beeb, the government could set out revised public service broadcasting requirements, financed by the government, for which the various eligible channels could bid.
Third, I get what you said about accessibility. However, if BBC services were available on demand with perhaps some additional premium and archive material and a separate free streaming service funded by commercials was provided, that would overcome the accessibility problem.
The government is still banging on about a subscription model, so I wouldn’t discount that too lightly. Bear in mind that a growing number of people happen to agree with that as well.
|
|
|
11-11-2020, 11:22
|
#33
|
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 37,115
|
Re: The BBC charter renewal process begins
I think it's fair to say some Tory MPs are still banging on about a subscription model. The government isn't; in fact, Hugh posted a news report yesterday (Post 19 above) that demonstrates the Culture Secretary is asking 'how much'? with regards to the licence fee, not whether there should be one.
I think Guido Fawkes (who I mentioned yesterday) is also right in his assessment of the advisory panel set up to explore the future of public service broadcasting. There are senior industry figures who have expressed scepticism about the TV licence who could have been coopted onto that panel, but none of them were. It's filled with people who are more likely to assume that future public service broadcasting should continue to enjoy public funding in some way.
|
|
|
11-11-2020, 12:13
|
#34
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: At the Leaving door
Posts: 4,050
|
Re: The BBC charter renewal process begins
I'm not a TV watcher, but obviously catch stuff when 'her indoors' is glued to it.
IMO if the beeb go subscription they'll lose out to those doing it for longer and probably better.
If they go down the adverts route, it will simply become awful programs shoved between 5 adverts every hour . . . and the radio will be the same, 2/3 of a song played after every 10 minutes of chatting.
Oh, and from a mans point of view there is lots of choice viewing on subscription platforms, but with women . . . Ant & Dec, the Soaps, and Celebrity shite are the winners . . so unless the BBC lower their standards they'll never compete
|
|
|
11-11-2020, 12:19
|
#35
|
vox populi vox dei
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the last resort
Services: every thing
Posts: 13,740
|
Re: The BBC charter renewal process begins
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carth
I'm not a TV watcher, but obviously catch stuff when 'her indoors' is glued to it.
IMO if the beeb go subscription they'll lose out to those doing it for longer and probably better.
If they go down the adverts route, it will simply become awful programs shoved between 5 adverts every hour . . . and the radio will be the same, 2/3 of a song played after every 10 minutes of chatting.
Oh, and from a mans point of view there is lots of choice viewing on subscription platforms, but with women . . . Ant & Dec, the Soaps, and Celebrity shite are the winners . . so unless the BBC lower their standards they'll never compete
|
They never play Hotel California to the end now
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
|
|
|
11-11-2020, 12:28
|
#36
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: At the Leaving door
Posts: 4,050
|
Re: The BBC charter renewal process begins
Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf
They never play Hotel California to the end now
|
True, and applies to many 'classic' songs
|
|
|
11-11-2020, 13:40
|
#37
|
Sulking in the Corner
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: RG41
Services: 1 Gbps; Hub 4 MM; ASUS RT-AX88U; Ultimate VOLT. BT Infinity2; Devolo 1200AV
Posts: 11,955
|
Re: The BBC charter renewal process begins
A referendum could be the start for an answer.
__________________
Seph.
My advice is at your risk.
|
|
|
11-11-2020, 14:34
|
#38
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 67
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 42,289
|
Re: The BBC charter renewal process begins
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
A referendum could be the start for an answer.
|
Binding, or non-binding?
__________________
There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
11-11-2020, 14:47
|
#39
|
Sulking in the Corner
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: RG41
Services: 1 Gbps; Hub 4 MM; ASUS RT-AX88U; Ultimate VOLT. BT Infinity2; Devolo 1200AV
Posts: 11,955
|
Re: The BBC charter renewal process begins
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Binding, or non-binding?
|
Good question. I think non-binding if the questions are well put. This would allow the government to see support for a range of options on which they could later put a binding referendum. Of course they won't do any of that as democracy is the minimum they can get away with.
__________________
Seph.
My advice is at your risk.
|
|
|
11-11-2020, 14:53
|
#40
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 67
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 42,289
|
Re: The BBC charter renewal process begins
Agreed
__________________
There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
13-11-2020, 19:52
|
#41
|
Rise above the players
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,622
|
Re: The BBC charter renewal process begins
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
I think it's fair to say some Tory MPs are still banging on about a subscription model. The government isn't; in fact, Hugh posted a news report yesterday (Post 19 above) that demonstrates the Culture Secretary is asking 'how much'? with regards to the licence fee, not whether there should be one.
I think Guido Fawkes (who I mentioned yesterday) is also right in his assessment of the advisory panel set up to explore the future of public service broadcasting. There are senior industry figures who have expressed scepticism about the TV licence who could have been coopted onto that panel, but none of them were. It's filled with people who are more likely to assume that future public service broadcasting should continue to enjoy public funding in some way.
|
That's a separate exercise, though. This refers to 2022, not 2032.
|
|
|
13-11-2020, 20:15
|
#42
|
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 37,115
|
Re: The BBC charter renewal process begins
If the licence fee is renewed in 2022 (which it will be), what are the chances of the licence fee being abolished in 2032? Or at least, how many years notice ahead of 2032 would have tho be given for the BBC to prepare for things to change?
|
|
|
13-11-2020, 20:52
|
#43
|
Architect of Ideas
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,547
|
Re: The BBC charter renewal process begins
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
A referendum could be the start for an answer.
|
If there's one way not to settle things in British politics
|
|
|
13-11-2020, 21:21
|
#44
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,182
|
Re: The BBC charter renewal process begins
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
If the licence fee is renewed in 2022 (which it will be), what are the chances of the licence fee being abolished in 2032? Or at least, how many years notice ahead of 2032 would have tho be given for the BBC to prepare for things to change?
|
I agree. On the Media Show last Wednesday, the Minister for Media (John Whittingdale) said that the BBC could not go subscription/encrypt until Freeview was closed down, which won't be for a long time yet.
It's here if anyone would like to listen to the interview:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000p79h
|
|
|
13-11-2020, 21:55
|
#45
|
Architect of Ideas
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,547
|
Re: The BBC charter renewal process begins
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
I agree. On the Media Show last Wednesday, the Minister for Media (John Whittingdale) said that the BBC could not go subscription/encrypt until Freeview was closed down, which won't be for a long time yet.
It's here if anyone would like to listen to the interview:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000p79h
|
One for Old Boy to dissect as we've got industry leaders in there. I'm not qualified to interpret the thoughts of those types.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:02.
|