You are here: Home | Forum | National Service in the British Military
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.
Keep them in school until age 16 : massaging the youth unemployment figures.
Keep them in school, college or apprenticeships until age 18 : massaging the youth unemployment figures.
Keep them in school, college or apprenticeships until age 18, then oblige them to do a year's National Service : massaging the youth unemployment figures.
In one hand we were warned that we live in particularly difficult/dangerous times on the other hand let’s take £2.5bn and waste it an an attempt to satisfy a desperate attempt to incentivise older voters rather than where it’s supposedly needed.
I fully expect the next Tory party political broadcast to feature the theme music from the Hovis advert and a sepia cobbled street.
As a side note approx 31yrs ago I had my final interview at Fulford barracks York. Thankfully the officer interviewing me realised I had no interest whatsoever in joining and it was all the ruse of my arse of a step father. Bullet dodged possibly in more ways than one
Speaking of £2.5 billion, where's it coming from? More importantly, why isn't it going to the regular Armed Forces? Someone, I forget who, pointed out that the Regulars are at their lowest numbers since Napoleon.
Marsh: My name is Corporal Marsh. B-A-S-T-A-R-D Marsh!
- Get Some In, S1E1
__________________
"People tend to confuse the words 'new' and 'improved'."
- Agent Phil Coulson, S.H.I.E.L.D.
Get ALL 16 year olds to do 2yrs of Bad Lads Army, get Cpl. Nauyokas out of retirement !
There's 1.6 million of them - he might need a megaphone...
__________________ There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it. If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Keep them in school until age 16 : massaging the youth unemployment figures.
Keep them in school, college or apprenticeships until age 18 : massaging the youth unemployment figures.
Keep them in school, college or apprenticeships until age 18, then oblige them to do a year's National Service : massaging the youth unemployment figures.
This is my thought exactly. I had to scroll a fair way before I found someone else thinking the same thing!
__________________
If one does not understand a person, one tends to regard him as a fool
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 37,115
Re: National Service in the British Military
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonbxx
Asked my 15 year old what she thought about this idea. Her response was ‘fruity’ and robust
(that said, she volunteers every week as a Junior Cub Scout Leader already)
The thing that’s most irritating about this proposal is that it deliberately refuses to engage with the fact that a good number of young people do actually do useful community volunteering already. The proposal bluntly states that national service (the community rather than the military variant) must be in addition to whatever else the young person has got going on.
I’m not remotely bothered about the practicalities of that because as we all know, this will never happen. The thing that appalls me is the mean-spiritedness evident in the very idea. It really is just brazen in its nastiness towards one part of society in pursuit of the approval of another.
From a generation that never did national service and has bled the country dry. Left the young in debt, with no prospects, no housing, and stopped them pursuing careers in EU countries. As long as we have the Proms, Dad's Army powdered egg and rationing back, everything will be super.
Time for the young to have a revolution, or at least motivate them to vote.
On the volunteering front, my eldest took part in the National Citizenship Service program launched by the David Cameron government a while back (https://wearencs.com/) which was a weeks residential course which included life skills, teamwork, employment skills, etc. and a weeks volunteering (she worked at a women’s shelter) Locally, the course was co-sponsored by Watford FC.
The course was brilliantly run and she got a lot out of it, including a certificate ‘signed’ by Boris Johnson the day after he resigned.
Unfortunately, the funding has been cut by nearly 70% on the orders of the then Chancellor, one R. Sunak…
And has anyone thought to ask the Regulars what they think? I doubt it. It's all very well expecting National Service draftees to pursue peacetime roles (not that a lot of 'em aren't doing that already). But what happens if they're actually called up?!
Ask a 20-year squaddie if s/he wants an untrained civilian, a mere 18 years of age at that, to back them up in a firefight. You think the Armed Forces are down now? Regulars will quit en masse in self-preservation, and hang their pensions - you can't spend money if you're dead!
No, the Tories are doomed now. For a whole bunch of reasons, this will never fly.
__________________
"People tend to confuse the words 'new' and 'improved'."
- Agent Phil Coulson, S.H.I.E.L.D.
...No, the Tories are doomed now. For a whole bunch of reasons, this will never fly.
Interesting final line. During the second global disagreement with Germany, young lads not old enough to pass a driving test today were placed in bombers and flew overseas to bring fire from the skies. They were capable enough. They won a war.
I wonder if your point is more about today's young peoples' capacity or willing rather than their age. Perhaps then this is more about the values and standards in today's society? Perhaps if we look at it from that angle, we might argue that giving these young people, where society has become too lenient and too 'tolerant', where there are no boundaries or consequences for their actions even from their parents, might give them a place to grow and develop. Where they can build lasting comraderies and friendships. Where they might find a calling, or at the very least, something they can feel proud about and where acheivement (likely something they rarely experienced in school or at home) is rewarded and recognised.
Sometimes, people need to be pushed into something that is outside of their comfort zone at first, to actually reach their potential. Maybe this is that thing for many, many young people struggling to find a way in life, where the opportunities are harder to find, things cost far more than they did and thus their prospects are deminishing all the time.
Do you think this is an unrealistic scenario that a lot of young people face?
__________________
If one does not understand a person, one tends to regard him as a fool
But there was an existential threat during WW2 - the only threat being addressed by the Tories’ proposal is them losing the election, so they’re going for the Boomer vote (most of whom haven’t served in any way, shape or form.).
__________________ There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it. If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Join CF
You are here: 
Baby, I was born this way.
