U.S President: Donald Trump
29-10-2017, 00:43
|
#2386
|
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,105
|
Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
Just because they found no evidence, does not mean there was no negligence on her part, she told a pack of lies under oath according to one if the Benghazi victims mothers.
|
|
|
29-10-2017, 09:03
|
#2387
|
Woke and proud !
Join Date: Jun 2004
Services: TV, Phone, BB, a wife
Posts: 9,225
|
Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
Just because they found no evidence, does not mean there was no negligence on her part, she told a pack of lies under oath according to one if the Benghazi victims mothers.
|
Seems there's a different standard of proof/evidence required for some depending on whether it's Trump (always innocent, all evidence is 'fake'), or Clinton (always guilty, no matter what the 'fake' facts say...)
|
|
|
29-10-2017, 10:01
|
#2388
|
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,105
|
Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr K
Seems there's a different standard of proof/evidence required for some depending on whether it's Trump (always innocent, all evidence is 'fake'), or Clinton (always guilty, no matter what the 'fake' facts say...)
|
What part of the Benghazi mother saying Hillary, told a pack of lies under oath, do you not get? Huh ?
That is not a fake fact.
I also notice your own failure to list Trumps recent failures that you said he has made, that these so called ‘distractions’ on the Uranium One scandal, that has not been disproven and Republicans calling for special prosecutor and the Fake Russian Dossier that the Clintons and DNC paid millions to?
|
|
|
29-10-2017, 10:37
|
#2389
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,344
|
Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr K
Seems there's a different standard of proof/evidence required for some depending on whether it's Trump (always innocent, all evidence is 'fake'), or Clinton (always guilty, no matter what the 'fake' facts say...)
|
It seems like Clinton is guilty until proven innocent and Trump innocent until proven guilty. For example, we've seen how a war widow couldn't possibly be correct when discussing the muti-witnessed phone call from Donald Trump yet when the Benghazi mother said Hillary Clinton lied she was obviously correct.
And when it comes to challenging Trump's lack of legislative achievements all I hear is something that most VM customers are well used to hearing. Coming soon!
|
|
|
29-10-2017, 11:14
|
#2390
|
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,105
|
Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
It seems like Clinton is guilty until proven innocent and Trump innocent until proven guilty. For example, we've seen how a war widow couldn't possibly be correct when discussing the muti-witnessed phone call from Donald Trump yet when the Benghazi mother said Hillary Clinton lied she was obviously correct.
|
I never doubted what he said in the phone call, I actually said that what he said, was nothing wrong and he was advised to say what he said by General Kelly, and other military friends of mine say also there was nothing wrong, it was honourable thing to say.
The pathetic Democratic Congresswoman who witnessed the call was being political. Though it turns out her voting on bills history for Veterans shows she voted against most veteran bills that benefits ex military personnel.
Big difference here than you saying what is fact and what isn’t. But as usual, in your rush to defend your liberal buddy, you’ve got yourself in muddle.
---------- Post added at 11:14 ---------- Previous post was at 11:02 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
And when it comes to challenging Trump's lack of legislative achievements all I hear is something that most VM customers are well used to hearing. Coming soon!
|
Lack of what sorry ?
If you’re going to distort the truth because you have an agenda, please stop doing a piss poor job at it.
List of his legislative changes...
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-...value=0&page=1
I repeat for the benefit of your ignorance, but Trump’s major budget reforms also passed in the house this week, paving the way for his tax plans to help middle class.
|
|
|
29-10-2017, 12:46
|
#2391
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,344
|
Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
I never doubted what he said in the phone call, I actually said that what he said, was nothing wrong and he was advised to say what he said by General Kelly, and other military friends of mine say also there was nothing wrong, it was honourable thing to say.
The pathetic Democratic Congresswoman who witnessed the call was being political. Though it turns out her voting on bills history for Veterans shows she voted against most veteran bills that benefits ex military personnel.
Big difference here than you saying what is fact and what isn’t. But as usual, in your rush to defend your liberal buddy, you’ve got yourself in muddle.
|
You failed to condemn Trump for lying about not saying what he said to the war widow and his follow-up lie about having evidence to back up his claim. Why not be a bit more balanced and do so?
|
|
|
29-10-2017, 13:10
|
#2392
|
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,105
|
Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
You failed to condemn Trump for lying about not saying what he said to the war widow and his follow-up lie about having evidence to back up his claim. Why not be a bit more balanced and do so?
|
No, because you're wrong, again.
He did not lie FFS. What he said was taken out of context to portray him in a bad light, so he is denying he said it, like it is being put out by the liberal media. Then General Kelly, comes out to back up that he advised Trump what to say, to Gold star families on those phonecalls. It's not hard to join the bloody dots, unless one has an agenda like you.
I cannot condemn Trump on 'that' specific phonecall because, you, nor I, have not heard the entire conversation of 'that' phonecall, I cannot judge some line that some POS Democrat, has taken out of it and what was said out of context, then she has gone running to her leftie buddies in the media to try and politicise a story on a dead soldier.
|
|
|
29-10-2017, 23:41
|
#2393
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,344
|
Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
Meanwhile, as we know, US intelligence agencies have already concluded that the Russian government sought to help Mr Trump win the election. Their current investigation is now looking into whether there were links between Russia and the Trump campaign.
The investigation is apparently getting close to a decision and Trump is not a happy chappy! https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump
Good article here about it all. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41796255
---------- Post added at 23:41 ---------- Previous post was at 21:56 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
II repeat for the benefit of your ignorance, but Trump’s major budget reforms also passed in the house this week, paving the way for his tax plans to help middle class.
|
They're now in trouble.
Quote:
The National Association of Home Builders, after learning that a “homeownership” tax credit it had wanted will not be in an initial version of the bill, is preparing a nationwide campaign against it. The development underscored just how difficult the prospect of a successful tax overhaul will be, given the complex and competing interests that President Trump and GOP lawmakers are trying to serve.
“We will do everything we can to defeat this thing,” said Jerry Howard, chief executive of the National Association of Home Builders.
|
https://www.washingtonpost.com/power...=.36c4a1a0374a
|
|
|
30-10-2017, 02:09
|
#2394
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 46
Posts: 13,996
|
Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
No, because you're wrong, again.
I cannot condemn Trump on 'that' specific phonecall because, you, nor I, have not heard the entire conversation of 'that' phonecall, I cannot judge some line that some POS Democrat, has taken out of it and what was said out of context, then she has gone running to her leftie buddies in the media to try and politicise a story on a dead soldier.
|
So you disbelieve the widow and family of the fallen too? Given Trump's long history of making inappropriate comments it really much of a reach to imagine him saying that stuff?
The burden of proof you require seems very different depending on whether or not you like what may be said.
The Uranium One stuff is nonsense.
https://twitter.com/MyDaughtersArmy/...02075170193408
People who scream about fake news the loudest seem to be those who have the most obvious agendas. You seem to refuse to condemn Trump full stop, regardless of the evidence, but take every opportunity to condemn his opponents, whether real or imagined.
Regarding the budget by the way: it's largely meaningless. It was passed in a hurry to allow use of procedures to force tax cuts through without a super-majority and is not binding.
|
|
|
30-10-2017, 04:44
|
#2395
|
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,105
|
Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet
So you disbelieve the widow and family of the fallen too? Given Trump's long history of making inappropriate comments it really much of a reach to imagine him saying that stuff?
The burden of proof you require seems very different depending on whether or not you like what may be said.
|
You mean the stuff he was ‘advised’ to say, even by a military person such as General Kelly?
As I said, cannot really pass a full judgement, the full conversation is not known. But I found nothing wrong with what was took out of context.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet
The Uranium One stuff is nonsense.
|
I beg to differ, seems some Republican Senators do too and the fact that the Department of Justice lifted a gag order on an FBI informant surrounding the deal, so they can testify in the House.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet
People who scream about fake news the loudest seem to be those who have the most obvious agendas. You seem to refuse to condemn Trump full stop, regardless of the evidence, but take every opportunity to condemn his opponents, whether real or imagined.
|
I had an agenda, it was hoping the DNC and Hillary lost, she did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet
Regarding the budget by the way: it's largely meaningless. It was passed in a hurry to allow use of procedures to force tax cuts through without a super-majority and is not binding.
|
I’m well aware of the GOPs intent and I wouldn’t call a 4 Trillion dollar budget that just passed, meaningless.
|
|
|
30-10-2017, 07:36
|
#2396
|
cf.mega pornstar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,856
|
Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
So what if the donald wrote this letter himself about himself, all it proves is that 20 years ago he was a narcissistic, self obsessed potential psychopath, pretty much the same as he is now really
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entr...b03cd20b80c787
---------- Post added at 07:36 ---------- Previous post was at 07:16 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet
So you disbelieve the widow and family of the fallen too? Given Trump's long history of making inappropriate comments it really much of a reach to imagine him saying that stuff?
The burden of proof you require seems very different depending on whether or not you like what may be said.
|
No fight will go unpicked by the donald, be they war widow or war hero
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
You mean the stuff he was ‘advised’ to say, even by a military person such as General Kelly?
|
Yes, just because the general found solace in those words it doesn't mean everyone will, especially someone of a non military bent, it's one of those times imo when it's best not to say anything, just let the person know you'll do anything you can for them and are thinking of them, just a thought, might be the wrong thought but I doubt the call would've ended up being worse than the one he actually made.
Last edited by TheDaddy; 30-10-2017 at 07:42.
|
|
|
30-10-2017, 09:25
|
#2397
|
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,105
|
Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
|
Come on Thedaddy, surely you can see this is just pure click bait. Page is just riddled with ads.
I don't deny, he has a high self-promoting, self loving personality, not sure why this is a personality disorder, this is a trait I could also apply to most of the planet.
Most people big themselves up in life. To get a job, to get a partner. It's called living, but not many get to be the President of the United States. Sure, he spent big trying to get there, but Hillary spent much more trying to as well, pretty sure she is a high, self promoter too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thedaddy
Yes, just because the general found solace in those words it doesn't mean everyone will, especially someone of a non military bent, it's one of those times imo when it's best not to say anything, just let the person know you'll do anything you can for them and are thinking of them, just a thought, might be the wrong thought but I doubt the call would've ended up being worse than the one he actually made.
|
Agree, people react differently to different things when they go through grief, General Kelly did actually advise him not to make the call at all, but then Trump thought if he doesn't he will be taken to task by the already Anti-Trump media, he made the call and he still is.
|
|
|
30-10-2017, 13:07
|
#2399
|
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,105
|
Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
|
Nope no surprises here at all.
Just released by the Reuters news agency, a Dozen charges are being levied, one of them laundering money and another, conspiracy against the U.S, lots of other issues related to other financial crimes.
|
|
|
30-10-2017, 13:19
|
#2400
|
Woke and proud !
Join Date: Jun 2004
Services: TV, Phone, BB, a wife
Posts: 9,225
|
Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
Nope no surprises here at all.
|
No surprises for the Donald either given the amount of tweets he's been putting out. Anything to distract from his ever nearing appointment with Justice. Manafort might have some interesting info....
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:36.
|