View Single Post
Old 10-02-2024, 13:29   #782
jfman
Architect of Ideas
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,403
jfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronze
jfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronze
Re: The future of television

Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY View Post
What I said was that the idea of making a package of sports available on different platforms could catch on. It's one way of reducing the cost to companies of providing sports content, and consumers pay less too because they are not forced to subscribe to more than one streamer to watch their favourite content.
Why would it catch on? Anyone who wants sports can get it off Sky. Sky monetise it successfully.

Those with the begging bowl out for paltry rights can aggregate it as much as they wish it doesn’t add up to a viable platform.
jfman is online now   Reply With Quote