Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
My guess is that what they’re actually after is ‘family voting’ which is prevalent in certain ethnic communities in certain metropolitan areas that typically vote Labour. In that sense they’re trying to tackle something that is illegal, but by its nature goes largely unreported. Given the racial aspect to it they couldn’t say out loud that that’s what they’re doing.
Obviously that would explain why they’re doing voter ID, not why they’ve devised such an exceptionally complex proof-of-ID system to go with it.
|
Not largely unreported on cableforum, I started a thread on it myself some while back
Yes exceptionally complicated and expensive, no money for nurses but money no object for this nonsense. This shower can't even win a corrupt election, don't they realise it's a governments duty to make voting easier or something
---------- Post added at 23:42 ---------- Previous post was at 23:40 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr K
This might well have backfired.
It was of course intended to suppress non-Tory voters, but looks like it may have suppressed the elderly Tory vote 
Guess Voter ID will get the boot very shortly. Democracy in action, UK style... |
Prepare for them to scrap elections altogether, they may even claim it's the will of the people