Thread: Voter ID
View Single Post
Old 22-05-2023, 19:53   #107
OLD BOY
Rise above the players
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,589
OLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronze
OLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronze
Re: Voter ID
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
Unlike you to make an extremely unlikely proposition to make a point…

(btw, it takes a couple of weeks, rather than a couple of seconds, for the zygote to implant and develop into an embryo within the blastocyst, but besides that, and their lack of photo ID, cool story, bro…).

OB seemed to be trying to say that people aged 17 years and 364 days (365 in a Leap Year) were children, but suddenly, a couple of seconds after midnight, they were then adults and capable of the responsibility to vote, trying to seemingly make that point to show that sixteen year olds weren’t responsible enough to get the vote - I was trying to (but obviously not very well) highlight the fallacious nature of that assumption by showing that voting age has evolved over time (as in, it’s not that simple…).
You forgot to mention that I pointed out to you that you had totally missed the point. The point was that legislation should be consistent and joined up.
__________________
Forumbox.co.uk
OLD BOY is online now   Reply With Quote