Quote:
Originally Posted by m419
I think what they will do is run the two companies seperately like Vodafone and 3 in Australia.
|
You'll probably get two company names as such, but the whole point of the tie up is to eliminate costs where resources overlap. Certainly I think when contracts come up for renewal, then there will be a common contract offered for both sets of customers - and I wouldn't hold my breath about it being cheaper.
---------- Post added at 01:45 ---------- Previous post was at 01:42 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Initially, perhaps, but if they want to make this deal work financially in the medium term they are going to have to come up with a single, unified brand and pricing structure.
|
Probably higher too..