Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
Who appoints themselves are the decider between those 2?
|
Under the proposed system, it would be the recipient of such material or someone who comes across it. They would report it to an impartial moderator who would take into account all views and the law after full training had been given. If either party didn't agree with the outcome, they would be free to appeal to a higher body, take their own legal action etc.
I think that the aim would be to settle most incidents amicalably and informally (much like the current ombudsmen services that exist).