Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Of course they are.
Climate denier “arguments” are typically characterised by an inability to critically appraise evidence and a tendency to select items that reinforce prior assumptions. They (and conspiracists more generally) betray their poorly developed critical skills by avoiding actually constructing arguments of their own. They prefer to demand their opponents “do their research” and may or may not provide a series of links or quotes with little evidence that they’ve understood or engaged with the material in its context.
|
Perhaps I'm a climate denier then as I don't believe this planet is in any crisis at all. It has existed for well over a billion years and has undergone many changes in climate and will continue to exist.
It is the future of the human race that is the crisis but do we hear about that? No, it's all about save the planet that doesn't need saving, it will heal itself when we are long gone.