Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
If you didn't take it as resolved you should have raised it with Mick at the time instead of waiting for six months to do so.
You weren't threatened with legal action for your discriminatory comment, you were told to stop harrassing me by PM and refused.
Details of said comment have been kept on file...
I have already accepted and agreed that those in non protected groups have remedies open to them. In fact, this may be the only way for this to be resolved
|
I let Mick make the decision, not that I thought it was resolved. The matter will never be resolved until you show me the evidence or apologise. I stated to you that I was willing to apologise to you if you could provide the evidence of what I said but you wouldn't. I've already stated why I let it go, I had more important things to worry about, these posts are an example of why I stated it's not just vulnerable people that need protecting. I'm glad you agree.
I know what I was threatened with legal action for which is why I said "and threatened legal action because I was asking you for evidence which you wouldn't provide". I wasn't harassing you, I was asking for evidence of something which you accused me of. Which goes back on topic of how am I supposed to protect myself when people like you who are threatening legal action when I want to get to the bottom of the accusation.
Details of no comment are on file Richard because I never once made fun of your disability. This is what I'm trying to do here, protect myself. You weren't willing to provide the evidence to either me or Mick yet still accused me of making fun of your disability then threatened legal action. How am I supposed to protect myself from that? I'm not vulnerable. So I think it's showing a bit of hypocrisy knowing your stance on the matter.