Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99
There is an interesting theory running around that says that had Johnson paid for his own legal defence, he could not have reported to the Police due to client confidentiality rules. As the state paid for the legal defence, these rights were not in place. Does this make sense?
|
Surely, they'd still be with holding evidence if they did not pass the information to the Police, whoever paid the bill?
If I was an unscrupulous lawyer looking for future work from Johnson, I might be tempted to say that the handwriting on page ZZ was a bit unclear, hint, hint, and he might wish to rewrite it again.