Thread: TV licence fee
View Single Post
Old 06-03-2022, 23:22   #51
OLD BOY
Rise above the players
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,589
OLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronze
OLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronze
Re: BBC licence fee
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1 View Post
Read the BBC's Public Purpose - it's not entertainment. And we all have to pay for services we don't use.

I fear your opinion has been formed from assumptions in place of very basic research. I also fear you won't alter your mind even when your assumptions are shown to be false.
The BBC May have a public service remit but most of the output can be described as entertainment. There is no reason why programmes such as ‘Killing Eve’ should be considered as part of the public service broadcast, is there?

The Public Service part of their TV operations could be put on one channel paid for by the government. The vast majority of the BBC’s content could be subscription only (or free with ads).
__________________
Forumbox.co.uk
OLD BOY is offline   Reply With Quote