Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
So the large numbers of unemployable dross should be given large sums, just so they aren't in poverty?
The average income would go up, so using the nonsensical definition of poverty, they would still be in poverty.
|
Neither our economic decline nor the fall in living standards have anything to do with the definition of poverty.
‘Large numbers of unemployable dross’ - exactly what you expect to be climbing over as you exit a major railway station as you think to yourself this is one of the great places on Earth to live
