Thread: Online Safety Bill
View Single Post
Old 03-05-2024, 13:03   #594
jfman
Architect of Ideas
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,480
jfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronze
jfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronze
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter View Post
The profit hungry websites. To be fair, more moderators have been taken on by the likes of Facebook etc.

Those who are found to have already been diagnosed or subsequently found to be neuro diverse would be able to provide proof from medical professionals as a defence should they find themselves in trouble for making inappropriate posts.

Action of some sort would still be needed to prevent them continuing to do this.
And is Paul meant to review all of the medical evidence provided for this site? Or pay someone? Is there a right to appeal for site administrators (who to? And at what cost?).

Totally unworkable. A data protection nightmare too.
jfman is offline   Reply With Quote