Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
|
That's an interesting find that makes sense.
Also Sky News is saying that the US will countenance Israel's invasion until the end of the year but Israel wants longer.
https://news.sky.com/story/the-clock...ution-13026178
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
More inclined to believe the United States Government than someone on an internet forum tbf.
One suspects their definition of “occupied” is more robust than the selective interpretations we see on here to absolve Israel of its humanitarian responsibilities. A damning indictment of the views of some on here as to whether Palestinians have humanitarian rights at all.
|
Yes, it's about the definition. Discussed here. The article lists a selection of bodies who categorise Gaza as being occupied and notes
Quote:
|
While they acknowledge that Israel no longer had the traditional marker of effective control after the disengagement—a military presence—they hold that with the help of technology, it has maintained the requisite control in other ways.
|
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blog...rnational-law/