View Single Post
Old 11-11-2022, 04:52   #2085
jfman
Architect of Ideas
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,479
jfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronze
jfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronze
Re: Russia has invaded Ukraine

Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99 View Post
If we're picking the "past agreements or principles" to justify support for Ukraine, which ones could we "pick from" would allow the opposite stance? If we are just being fickle in our cherry picking of international treaties & laws, I am intrigued to know which ones allow us to walk away from Ukraine and/or sell them short.
Presumably the same ones that allowed the US to withdraw from Afghanistan looting the Afghan central bank. A blind eye here, a nudge to the negotiating table there and bingo. America’s customers in Europe aren’t freezing to death and infrastructure systems hosting refugees can have that pressure released. Prepare for tears of joy going viral as families are reunited, whatever concessions are made deemed a reasonable compromise (whether they are or not) and Halliburton to trouser billions in rebuilding contracts.

Maybe I’m too cynical though.

Last edited by jfman; 11-11-2022 at 04:57.
jfman is online now   Reply With Quote