View Single Post
Old 13-08-2022, 11:01   #103
Mick
Cable Forum Team
 
Mick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,118
Mick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny star
Mick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny star
Re: FBI searches former president Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien View Post
No it isn't, that's what I am saying. There isn't a difference between what they've been accused of doing and the subsequent requirement for the FBI to investigate. Clinton was e-mails, Trump is physical files. Clinton's investigation is over and Trump is early days so we don't know what, if anything, he'll actually has.
There is no point keep saying she was cleared, she should never have been, the law exists on violations of classified material, and she should have been prosecuted for keeping a private server containing highly classified stuff on there. In her case, the law was selectively ignored.

You cannot have a law and then let someone get off Scot free when they violate it, yet she was and that was the wrong decision, you either believe in the rule of the law or you do not, just because of who it is.

Those emails were still classified and she did not have any permission to keep them on a private server, in her own property, same as Trump with these documents, only like you say, are in physical format, rather than a virtual one.

Classified material is either, they were not just random emails, they had classifications, and she violated laws on storage of and use of them.

---------- Post added at 11:01 ---------- Previous post was at 10:53 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman View Post
What Hillary didn’t or didn’t do is irrelevant to Trump. If he’s broke the law he’s broke the law. Anything else is a distraction or politicising it.

If the rule of law has been poorly applied in the past that’s not a get out of jail free card for Trump or his supporters.

If “ah but Hilliary” is the new “ah but Starmer” this could be long, circuitous thread ignoring the facts.
You as well, you need to wind your neck in too, I do not give a stuff about Trump, if he’s broke the law, fine, the book gets thrown at him, but we have a historical precedent of the law not being applied in such cases, & that matters, the law is the law, you cannot selectively let someone off for the same kind of violations on safe storage and use of classified material, Clinton was.
Mick is offline   Reply With Quote