[jfman]

I think the notion removing him upends anything is a creative interpretation of events.

The irony in your last sentence is he commands neither the support of his party or Parliament, when almost certainly there’s someone sitting behind him who would for an interim period.

This isn’t someone that the political winds shifted past them. This is a liar, a law-breaker, someone who meets a KGB agent following a NATO summit without the presence of officials. Starmer has every right to go for the open goal before him.