Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul
Right, because only members of one "party" have ever started up companies.  |
Party as in the non-political definition
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul
It would likely be a nightmare/disaster, and probably impossible to achieve, since you could almost never staisfy all three objectives. Also, how would you even define "detrimentally".
|
This just requires imagination & political will to achieve.
For example, a disaster capitalist buys a company to asset strip, laying off employees and impacting communities. A change in the law would not allow this without a balanced plan that compensates the other impacted parties.
Also, a company that trades in the UK, employs people in the UK and generates revenue & profit in the UK should pay tax in the UK.
And companies that trade in the fake free market should be legally compelled to invest, preferentially, in the infrastructure they manage over distributing profit to shareholders.