Cable Forum - Trump’s Troubles

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)

- Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)

- - Trump’s Troubles (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33711548)

Re: Trump’s Troubles

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36172826)

Sounds like someone left him alone with a cheap bottle of cooking wine.

He doesn't drink, his big brother drank himself to death brcause his family are so toxic, simplist solution is that he's lost the plot cognitively and no amout of getting person, woman, grab, camera, tv, in the right order hides that decline, what a country, those two are the best they could come up with, still without them this country might be the worlds laughing stock

Re: Trump’s Troubles

Move along please, nothing to see here folks!

Quote:

Trump Media saved in 2022 by Russian-American under criminal investigation

Trump’s social media company went public relying partly on loans from trust managed by person of interest to prosecutors

But Trump Media almost did not make it to the merger after regulators opened a securities investigation into the merger in 2021 and caused the company to burn through cash at an extraordinary rate as it waited to get the green light for its stock market debut.

The situation led Trump Media to take emergency loans, including from an entity called ES Family Trust, which opened an account with Paxum Bank, a small bank registered on the Caribbean island of Dominica that is best known for providing financial services to the porn industry.

Through leaked documents, the Guardian has learned that ES Family Trust operated like a shell company for a Russian-American businessman named Anton Postolnikov, who co-owns Paxum Bank and has been a subject of a years-long joint federal criminal investigation by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) into the Trump Media merger.

Postolnikov, the nephew of Aleksandr Smirnov, an ally of the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, has not been charged with a crime. In response to an email to Postolnikov seeking comment, a lawyer in Dominica representing Paxum Bank warned of legal action for reporting the contents of the leaked documents.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ust-2022-loans

Re: Trump’s Troubles

Think the court has rejected donnies bond, Mr Hankey didn't fill his forms in right and no that's not Mr Hankey the Christmas poo although he probably is a bit of a shit, anyone who makes money from usury generally is

Re: Trump’s Troubles

His greatest victory could also be his biggest vote loser , getting a right wing supreme court , could cost him a lot of votes . Clue Wade v Roe and younger women's vote. Just a thought

Re: Trump’s Troubles

https://wapo.st/3wy9o7f

Quote:

Donald Trump was threatened with jail for any future violations of a limited gag order imposed in his falsifying business records case.

New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan made it clear to Trump that his 10th gag order violation — which he ruled on at the start of Monday’s court session — was going to be the last that would result in only a fine.

“The last thing I want to do is put you in jail,” Merchan said. “You are the former president of the United States and possibly the next president as well.”

The judge noted that jailing Trump would require a monumental effort involving several law enforcement agencies including the Secret Service and New York’s corrections department.

“To take that step would be disruptive to these proceedings,” Merchan added.

Last week, Merchan held Trump in contempt of court for violating the gag order nine times, fined him $9,000 — $1,000 per each violation — and warned him that he could go to jail if he keeps breaking the court’s rules.

I notice how they dont want Donny to speak..... I wonder why?? :D

Re: Trump’s Troubles

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dude111 (Post 36174664)

I notice how they dont want Donny to speak..... I wonder why?? :D

Possibly because there's a law against intimidating jurors and witnesses and commenting on them could be seen as intimidation?

Re: Trump’s Troubles

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dude111 (Post 36174664)

I notice how they dont want Donny to speak..... I wonder why?? :D

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/...case-109937362

Quote:

Virtually every day of his hush money criminal trial, former President Donald Trump talks about how he can’t talk about the case.

A gag order bars Trump from commenting publicly on witnesses, jurors and some others connected to the matter. The New York judge already has found that Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, repeatedly violated the order, fined him $9,000 and warning that jail could follow if he doesn't comply.

But the order doesn't stop Trump from talking about the allegations against him or commenting on the judge or the elected top prosecutor. And despite a recent Trump remark, it doesn't stop him from testifying in court if he chooses.

As he fights the felony charges against him while running for president, Trump has at times stirred confusion about what he can and can't do in the case. He has pleaded not guilty.

So what does the order do, what doesn't it and where did it come from?

Generally speaking, a gag order is a judge's directive prohibiting someone or people involved in a court case from publicly commenting about some or all aspects of it. In Trump’s case, it’s titled an “Order Restricting Extrajudicial Statements,” with “extrajudicial” meaning outside of court.

Gag orders, particularly in high-profile cases, are intended to prevent information presented outside a courtroom from affecting what happens inside.

Quote:

Initially imposed March 26, the gag order bars Trump from making or directing others to make public statements about any juror and about any “reasonably foreseeable" witness' participation in the investigation or the trial.

It also bars any statements about lawyers in the case, court staffers, prosecution aides and relatives of all of the above, to the extent that the statements are intended to “materially interfere with, or to cause others to materially interfere with” their work on the case “or with the knowledge that such interference is likely to result.”

The order doesn’t apply to Judge Juan M. Merchan or to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, whose office is bringing the case. It does apply to comments about their family members, however. Merchan added that provision on April 1 after Trump lashed out on social media at the judge’s daughter, a Democratic political consultant, and made a claim about her that was later repudiated by court officials.

Trump is also allowed to talk about his political opponents, as Merchan made clear on Thursday.

Ah that explains it.......

Thats Hugh :)