Cable Forum
Page 1 of 5 1 2345
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710964)

Carth 16-04-2022 11:30
Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan
 
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have arrived at the Invictus Games in the Netherlands, after stopping off to visit the Queen on their way.

It is the first time Prince Harry and Meghan have appeared in Europe in public together since stepping back as senior royals in 2020.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61122854

I've got no problem with the Invictus Games, good thing and something 'our harry' can be commended for seeing as he founded the games.

However, the couple still being named as 'The Duke and Duchess of Sussex' royally (sic) pees me off, as does this:

Quote:
The visit to Europe comes as Prince Harry is bringing a court challenge against the UK government's decision to refuse police security during his visits from the US.
Needs to make his mind up if he's part of the 'Family' or just another American celebrity on the circuit.

Opinions may vary, and I'm sure others think he (and her) are absolutely brilliant :erm:

Hugh 16-04-2022 11:46
Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan
 
The legal action is to allow him to pay for the security himself…

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60438739

https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity...thing-to-know/

Quote:
"Prince Harry inherited a security risk at birth, for life. He remains sixth in line to the throne, served two tours of combat duty in Afghanistan, and in recent years his family has been subjected to well-documented neo-Nazi and extremist threats,” the January 2022 statement read. “While his role within the Institution has changed, his profile as a member of the royal family has not. Nor has the threat to him and his family.”

Carth 16-04-2022 12:14
Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan
 
Well the BBC should explain things better then . . . and IMO, he's in more danger from her than anyone with a weapon :D

Chris 16-04-2022 12:44
Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36119271)
Well the BBC should explain things better then . . . and IMO, he's in more danger from her than anyone with a weapon :D
It’s a common problem on the BBC website out of hours and on bank holidays. Junior reporters and disinterested second-line news editors get the crappy shifts. They’re not the best at what they do in the first place, and couple that with their understandable desire not to be in the office on the weekend and this is what you end up with.

That article is written by someone who has no specialism in royal reporting and no evidence of having been assigned to follow any of the other stories that have been referenced. In fact a good chunk of it is simply hyperlinks to other BBC news stories which the hack in question clearly hasn’t bothered to read properly. Plus there’s that ever-present ‘here’s what we want you to think’ sidebar the BBC always shoves right into the middle of the copy, here written by a member of their foreign reporting staff who thinks she’s spotted her chance to show how great she is at writing royal puff pieces (she isn’t).

Paul 16-04-2022 21:17
Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36119269)
However, the couple still being named as 'The Duke and Duchess of Sussex' royally (sic) pees me off
That is who they are (still) so not sure why it would bother anyone. :confused:

heero_yuy 17-04-2022 08:02
Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan
 
I hate it that they are dragging the good name of my county through the dirt. Those titles should be removed from them.

Maggy 17-04-2022 09:00
Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36119282)
That is who they are (still) so not sure why it would bother anyone. :confused:
:tu:

---------- Post added at 09:00 ---------- Previous post was at 08:59 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 36119289)
I hate it that they are dragging the good name of my county through the dirt. Those titles should be removed from them.
No they are not. They haven't robbed,murdered or cheated anyone unlike some members of the family.

papa smurf 17-04-2022 09:35
Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan
 
I like Harry and Megan, i have no time for Charles and his bit on the side, William and Kate are utterly cringeworthy.

TheDaddy 17-04-2022 16:07
Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36119291)
:tu:

---------- Post added at 09:00 ---------- Previous post was at 08:59 ----------



No they are not. They haven't robbed,murdered or cheated anyone unlike some members of the family.
They lie about everything and I don't like that, so in that respect they are dragging their family and by extension the country through the gutter, I'm no particular fan of their family btw but the lies seem to come from a very dark place, I suspect he's a very unhappy boy

Paul 17-04-2022 19:54
Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36119301)
They lie about everything and I don't like that
Um ... what :confused:

---------- Post added at 19:54 ---------- Previous post was at 19:53 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 36119289)
I hate it that they are dragging the good name of my county through the dirt.
How exactly are they doing that ?

TheDaddy 17-04-2022 21:51
Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36119309)
Um ... what :confused:
You do like it or something?

Quote:
How exactly are they doing that ?
By lying, classics like the Arch Bishop of Canterbury marrying them in secret, Archie not being allowed to be a prince 'coz he's black, that kind of nonsense

Maggy 17-04-2022 22:07
Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36119301)
They lie about everything and I don't like that, so in that respect they are dragging their family and by extension the country through the gutter, I'm no particular fan of their family btw but the lies seem to come from a very dark place, I suspect he's a very unhappy boy
You need to stop reading the crappy newspapers that love to write any rubbish about them just to make cash.

TheDaddy 17-04-2022 22:16
Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36119324)
You need to stop reading the crappy newspapers that love to write any rubbish about them just to make cash.
I haven't read a newspaper or anything else that isn't in very large print for a couple of years. Are you saying they were married in secret after all and Archie really isn't allowed to be a Prince because he's black?

Paul 17-04-2022 22:30
Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36119323)
You do like it or something?
Do I like what :confused:

I cannot make any sense of your babbling nonsense atm.

Maggy 18-04-2022 08:36
Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36119325)
I haven't read a newspaper or anything else that isn't in very large print for a couple of years. Are you saying they were married in secret after all and Archie really isn't allowed to be a Prince because he's black?
No I'm saying stop reading crappy news outlets.

---------- Post added at 08:36 ---------- Previous post was at 08:35 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36119326)
Do I like what :confused:

I cannot make any sense of your babbling nonsense atm.
:tu:


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:49.
Page 1 of 5 1 2345
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.