Cable Forum - Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)

- Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)

- - Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710964)

Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan

You mean the interview with Oprah was completely faked and nobody noticed or complained?:shocked:
:rolleyes:

Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36119345)

No I'm saying stop reading crappy news outlets.[COLOR="Silver"]

How about saying it to someone who actually does then, they're full of it, "my family cut me off when we announced we were leaving", turns out his dad gave him 7 million quid was another classic

---------- Post added at 14:42 ---------- Previous post was at 14:40 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36119348)

You mean the interview with Oprah was completely faked and nobody noticed or complained?:shocked:
:rolleyes:

Oh yes it's all there in thar awful interview, wonder if Operah still talks to them after that car crash.

Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36119345)

No I'm saying stop reading crappy news outlets.

---------- Post added at 08:36 ---------- Previous post was at 08:35 ----------

:tu:

I still don't understand all the shock & horror about the remark about what colour the baby would be.

If two people of different colours have a child together, it's perfectly natural to wonder what colour it will be- there's nothing racist about it.

In my opinion it's no different to if two black people had a baby and people wondering if the child will look more like their mother or their father.

If two white people had a baby, it's only natural to wonder if the child will have its mother or fathers eye colour, hair colour etc.

Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36119413)

And some of us don't care.

Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36119424)

And some of us don't care.

It's part of the widespread relentless anti-white racism, so people SHOULD care.

Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36119426)

It's part of the widespread relentless anti-white racism, so people SHOULD care.

Spot on.

Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36119426)

It's part of the widespread relentless anti-white racism, so people SHOULD care.

Is it? I thought it was the media trying to drive an imaginary wedge between Harry and his brother and rest of the family. If any of you knew me you would know that I've been shouting about racism ALL my life. What I don't care about anymore is the false narrative set up to indicate racism in the Royal Family.Some of the media headlines and articles about Harry and Meghan have been truly horrendous and I just don't read any of their crap anymore.It's the media that have set up this situation.Now Harry is becoming a media darling again until the said media want to sell news during a slump in sales. That's why I have ceased to care what the newspapers report because they are no longer bastions of any kind of truth.

Anyway just what is anti-white racism?

Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan

"anti-white racism" is the latest "woke" or "politically correct" and "critical race theory" - a meaningless statement used to provoke reactions…

Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36119430)

The media? Not when we're talking about things said by THEM in a TV interview.:rolleyes:

The relentless implication by THEM is that everybody was racist towards her. The implication being that the comment about the potential colour of their baby was inherently racist. Why else mention it in the first place?
So there are no meetings with FORCED attendance about "white privilege"? No annual White Privilege conferences occurring for more than 20 years? No enforced meetings(eg Seattle council) where white people are expected to have to give up jobs, friends, property etc, and even put themselves in physical and emotional danger.

Not to mention the TV presenter who talked about non-melanated(ie white) people being annihilated(his words). When it was pointed out that included Jews, he had to apologise to them, but not to the rest of us. He is of course, still in his job. Those are the sort of things being discussed by people in private.
Try Googling "White Privilege". Only 2 BILLION references. Hardly a figment of the imagination.

Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan

Again, Nomad is spot on. The Oprah interview, as evidenced by the (pretend or otherwise) look of astonishment on Oprah's face when the natural question of the baby's colour came into discussion, clearly illustrates the woke attack on the expression of natural thought by white people. I'm sure that "non-melanated" folk would have thought the same.

Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36119434)

"anti-white racism" is the latest "woke" or "politically correct" and "critical race theory" - a meaningless statement used to provoke reactions…

I refuse to be provoked in that case.

Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan

Btw, I certainly support the case for Prince Harry to negotiate paying for his public protection when in the UK. As explained by Hugh, his rare situation as 6th in liner to the throne makes him a potential target for the nutters and terrorists waiting for an opportunity to strike.

Also, I'm happy for him to be known as Prince Harry; his title and functions are two separate things.

I'm not happy that they felt it necessary to leave the UK. My understanding is that the British press played a decisive hand in Megan's disillusionment and this led to Harry's decision. A "free press" doesn't always work to the good.

Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan

Any supposed negativity from the press has arisen from HER actions, not the other way around. Her actions have hardly been the sort to win people around, apart that is from the woke crowd. Eg The Oprah interview, which seems to have been planned long BEFORE they left. How many celebs did she invite to the wedding that actually knew her? EG Meeting Oprah only once before.

She desperately wants to build a platform for HERSELF(ie not including Harry). How many people would be aware of her, if it wasn't for the marriage?

Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan

Remember Diana? She became a target when she married Charles.It's about selling newspapers and nothing else.

Re: Harry (formerly known as prince) and Megan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36119430)

Anyway just what is anti-white racism?

I think it's a critical description of quotas or targets that companies and large organisations sometimes set on things like the composition of the board of directors, senior management team, etc.