Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...e-2088179.html |
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
Your initial premise was Hewitt was the father, but they didn’t meet until two years after Harry was born (according to multiple sources, including Hewitt)... |
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
Just to throw something else into the mix, take a look at post #9 and the other link here! https://www.forumbox.co.uk/forum/thr...-pat/?pageNo=1 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...e-concert.html I'd put money on Harry not being Charles son, but without a DNA test (which they'd never do), nobody will ever know for sure. I'm surprised the press haven't got someone to surreptitiously obtain the DNA of the men involved- would be a real scoop for them and may allow the palace to rid themselves of Harry, whilst degenerating the reputation of his late mother. |
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
1. Harry's eye's are as close together as the rest of the Royals, particularly Charlie Farley. 2. His smile, when he shows his teeth, is pure Charlie Farley (and indeed Mountbatten). |
Re: Meghan/Harry
56% are unsympathetic towards the Markles in a snap YouGov poll tonight.
|
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 00:54 ---------- Previous post was at 00:52 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 00:55 ---------- Previous post was at 00:54 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Meghan/Harry
Surprised the UK media entertain them.
Oh yes. Clickbait. Whip up the public into a frenzy and charge for clicks. Money for old rope for the media here. |
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
Hardship comes in all sorts of ways. When you are only a child and you lose your mum and have to cope with it whilst living your life surrounded by the media prying in then I can understand it is hard. I think Harry could see history beginning to repeat itself with his family being tormented by the press. He made the decision to protect his family. At no point did they say they wanted to abandon their royal duties....just take a step back like many other royals do. Instead they were seen as traitors and the Royal institution decided to take away everything and distance themselves from them. Harry and Meghan did the right thing. Imagine being tormented by the media since you've been born and the constant abuse. They decided to step away from that and are now exploring new opportunities. What they decide to do is up to them. |
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
Anyway, if they truly wanted to step out of the limelight then they could have done so but I don't think either of them could contemplate life without the media circus around them because I feel they're both getting a bit lost in their dillusions of self importance. If you court a life in the media (gutter press??) then don't be surprised if/when it turns on you because at the end of the day you're only there to sell column inches. |
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
---------- Post added at 09:13 ---------- Previous post was at 09:11 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 09:16 ---------- Previous post was at 09:13 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Meghan/Harry
it's a bit like a modern day Stones Vs The Beatles, Nirvana Vs Pearl Jam, Blur Vs Oasis,
The Racist Vs The Bully the media is building up the hype for a massive grudge match, let's get ready to rumble, or something Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
They are essentially a couple of Beverley Hills B-listers. There was nothing said in that interview that was in any way controversial, the media can try and spin it but there's nothing there to spin. She's a grifter, and has managed to get a payday for not very much content. |
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
This. |
Re: Meghan/Harry
I am surprised how many people want to pick sides in a family/institutional squabble they know little about. I don't think the interview with Oprah was a good idea as it comes across as playing the celebrity game, if they wanted to be taken more seriously in the U.K they should have done it with a U.K interviewer from BBC or Sky. This was designed for a U.S audience.
That said I also don't give much benefit of the doubt to the institution itself especially when see the stuff around Prince Andrew. |
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
It's a capitalist society. Give people what they want and you'll get coin. I hope the British press leave them alone. For their, and our, benefit. I suspect however we will get more pointless stories because it sells the rags and saves them from having to do proper journalism. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:47. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.