Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media TV Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   VOD : Linear is old tech - on demand is the future (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33705051)

jfman 02-03-2021 14:33

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Phunkenstein (Post 36072651)
As mentioned in the ‘Changes’ thread by ScottishSteve...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/20...adcast-channel

The BBC are betraying the streaming orthodoxy and bringing BBC3 back as a linear channel.

HEATHENS!

Global pandemic, linear resisting the death throes, Scotland beating England at the egg chasing.

Fourth horseman of the apocalypse due any second now...

gimpymoo 02-03-2021 15:59

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Considering BBC3 is aimed at a younger audience, younger audiences do not think "ooh, must be sat infront of the TV at 8pm"... That change has already happened. They do not even "record", they just catch it on iPlayer.

Why bring it back as a linear channel?

Some of the younger generation do not even know that TV comes through an aerial, they think it comes from wifi.

I would suggest it is more to justify the TV licence to the younger generation...

"Oh look, we bought this back... aren't we great"

OLD BOY 02-03-2021 16:08

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gimpymoo (Post 36072658)
Considering BBC3 is aimed at a younger audience, younger audiences do not think "ooh, must be sat infront of the TV at 8pm"... That change has already happened. They do not even "record", they just catch it on iPlayer.

Why bring it back as a linear channel?

Some of the younger generation do not even know that TV comes through an aerial, they think it comes from wifi.

I would suggest it is more to justify the TV licence to the younger generation...

"Oh look, we bought this back... aren't we great"

A lot of people contributing to this thread just don’t get it. Most people I speak to tell me that their kids don’t watch the scheduled channels, and most friends my age watch more VOD than those channels.

We see it with our eyes, we hear it with our ears, but some still do not get it. I don’t know if they ever will until these channels close down, as inevitably they will.

The content will be there, the channel owners will be there, but all their stuff will be VOD. No-one in the future is going to want their lives dictated by scheduled television.

Chris 02-03-2021 16:28

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/20...adcast-channel

Quote:

While the BBC does well with large parts of the younger audience - on average, young adults in the UK spend more media time per week (seven and a half hours) with BBC’s services than any other brand; our research identified a significant group of younger viewers who maintain a strong linear TV habit but are currently light users of the BBC.
Oh look, actual paid research, as opposed to the wishful thinking of some bored old geezer on the internet.

Mr K 02-03-2021 16:34

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36072660)
A lot of people contributing to this thread just don’t get it. Most people I speak to tell me that their kids don’t watch the scheduled channels, and most friends my age watch more VOD than those channels.

We see it with our eyes, we hear it with our ears, but some still do not get it. I don’t know if they ever will until these channels close down, as inevitably they will.

The content will be there, the channel owners will be there, but all their stuff will be VOD. No-one in the future is going to want their lives dictated by scheduled television.

What you could do of course is record TV programmes to watch when you want. Then you aren't at risk of buffering/network issues. Better PQ too. Sneaky eh? ;)

OLD BOY 02-03-2021 16:36

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36072664)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/20...adcast-channel



Oh look, actual paid research, as opposed to the wishful thinking of some bored old geezer on the internet.

But they are ‘light users of the BBC’. It’s in that very quote.

The Culture Minister is set on converting the licence fee to a subscription model, which will confound all those who deny vehemently that VOD is the future.

https://www.tvbeurope.com/business/w...peed-broadband

Despite having previously said scrapping the BBC’s licence fee is “politically impossible”, culture minister John Whittingdale has again mooted the idea that it could be axed when the current Royal Charter ends in 2027.

Speaking in parliament, Whittingdale said the rise of the streamers and the fall in young viewers watching live BBC channels meant the licence fee was becoming harder to justify.

Whittingdale added that the licence fee could not be scrapped “whilst a significant
proportion of the population relies on Freeview” to watch the BBC.

“The technology needs to be capable of delivering video on demand to everyone,” he added. “The technology does not allow it now. We will in a few years reach universal coverage and then it will be possible to introduce subscription services as an element of the funding.”

Supporting the petition, Conservative MP Jonathan Gullis said: “I agreed the licence fee should be scrapped at the next Charter Review. The Government should also decriminalise non-payment.”

jfman 02-03-2021 16:41

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Funny how the Culture Minister is set on becomes "mooting an idea" within a mere few lines.

OLD BOY 02-03-2021 16:45

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36072665)
What you could do of course is record TV programmes to watch when you want. Then you aren't at risk of buffering/network issues. Better PQ too. Sneaky eh? ;)

As you know, I do in fact record all the programmes that are not available for long on VOD, but that’s what we have to put up with in the interim.


It simply won’t work that way in the future. The advertisers would rather you didn’t fast forward through the adverts, of course!

---------- Post added at 16:45 ---------- Previous post was at 16:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36072668)
Funny how the Culture Minister is set on becomes "mooting an idea" within a mere few lines.

Argue about it until the cows come home if you like, but that’s what the government is intent on doing, if they are still in power then. I’m not sure where Labour stand on the issue, but I think they will have to wait longer than that before they get re-elected, frankly.

jfman 02-03-2021 16:49

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
No it's your interpretation of what you think the Government will do in six years time. There's no manifesto commitment, no proposed legislation. Nothing but your hopes and dreams.

The 2025 broadband commitment is getting watered down so much the networks, particularly in rural areas, will not be up to it.

Then you're goosed until 2037. Better get shifting those goalposts again OB.

Hugh 02-03-2021 17:19

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
"Moot"
Quote:

raise (a question or topic) for discussion; suggest (an idea or possibility).

OLD BOY 02-03-2021 17:21

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36072672)
No it's your interpretation of what you think the Government will do in six years time. There's no manifesto commitment, no proposed legislation. Nothing but your hopes and dreams.

The 2025 broadband commitment is getting watered down so much the networks, particularly in rural areas, will not be up to it.

Then you're goosed until 2037. Better get shifting those goalposts again OB.

No, 2027 is what he said. The Beeb confirmed a while ago that it was planning not to be using the existing transmitter system after the next licence fee review. The Culture Minister is saying he’s looking to abolish the licence fee from 2027.

As you always express a contrary view, I guess I must be on the right lines. You have nothing to back up your view, as usual.

---------- Post added at 17:21 ---------- Previous post was at 17:19 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36072673)
"Moot"

You need to read the article. He’s been mooting at doing this for sometime! It is only the broadband rollout that seems to be holding him back.

Hugh 02-03-2021 17:22

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
I did, in the Times.

"could be" is not "will be", and "allow subscription funding of the BBC to be considered" is not "will be", no matter how much you try to spin it...

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/t...band-2c88wx9h5

Quote:

The BBC could be moved away from the TV licence to a subscription model when superfast broadband is rolled out to all homes, the media minister said last night.

John Whittingdale said that there would “come a time” in the next few years when a Netflix-style funding system would be possible, but it would require every household to have the technology to watch programmes on demand over the internet, which is not the case now.

Whittingdale said that the government’s plans to accelerate the expansion of broadband could allow subscription funding of the BBC to be considered by the time the corporation’s royal charter expires in 2027.

OLD BOY 02-03-2021 17:22

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36072676)
"could be" is not "will be"

Resorting to pedantry now...:rolleyes:

Hugh 02-03-2021 17:25

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Or as everyone else calls it, correct use of language.

You could be tall, handsome, and attractive to women, but you not necessarily will be... ;)

One is definite, one is maybe...

If I had a million pounds, I could buy a big house (maybe)
If I had a million pounds, I would buy a big house (definite)

See the difference?

OLD BOY 02-03-2021 17:26

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36072678)
Or as everyone else calls it, correct use of language.

You could be tall, handsome, and attractive to women, but you not necessarily will be... ;)

I’d like to think so, though. :cool:

Mad Max 02-03-2021 17:55

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gimpymoo (Post 36072658)
Considering BBC3 is aimed at a younger audience, younger audiences do not think "ooh, must be sat infront of the TV at 8pm"... That change has already happened. They do not even "record", they just catch it on iPlayer.

Why bring it back as a linear channel?

Some of the younger generation do not even know that TV comes through an aerial, they think it comes from wifi.

I would suggest it is more to justify the TV licence to the younger generation...

"Oh look, we bought this back... aren't we great"

What's an aerial? ;)

jfman 02-03-2021 18:07

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36072674)
No, 2027 is what he said. The Beeb confirmed a while ago that it was planning not to be using the existing transmitter system after the next licence fee review. The Culture Minister is saying he’s looking to abolish the licence fee from 2027.

As you always express a contrary view, I guess I must be on the right lines. You have nothing to back up your view, as usual.

---------- Post added at 17:21 ---------- Previous post was at 17:19 ----------



You need to read the article. He’s been mooting at doing this for sometime! It is only the broadband rollout that seems to be holding him back.

Can you source the BBC saying they will not use the existing transmitter network after 2027?

Also any OFCOM or DCMS consultation on future use of the spectrum, any proposed auctioning off of said spectrum or anything indicative of your claim being true?

Conscious of the fact you often selectively interpret these things I'd be grateful for a look myself.

Thanks in advance.

pip08456 02-03-2021 18:44

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36072676)
I did, in the Times.

"could be" is not "will be", and "allow subscription funding of the BBC to be considered" is not "will be", no matter how much you try to spin it...

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/t...band-2c88wx9h5

"The Government via John Whittingdale MP are currently busy negotiating with the BBC about the level at which the licence fee should be set from 2022 to 2027 (it’s currently aligned to inflation). One of the proposals could eventually see it being replaced with a Netflix-style subscription model, but Whittingdale suggests (The Times) that this might have to wait until closer to 2027 so that universal coverage of faster broadband can be achieved.

John Whittingdale MP said:"

Quote:

Young people are turning more and more to video-on-demand services. That does beg the question about whether or not the licence fee model, which has been based on the fact that everybody used the BBC, can continue.

The rollout of broadband is very fast, we will reach universal coverage, and there will come a time when it would be possible for us to move towards a full subscription service for everybody, but that time has not yet arrived.
https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.ph...universal.html

OLD BOY 02-03-2021 18:56

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36072687)
Can you source the BBC saying they will not use the existing transmitter network after 2027?

Also any OFCOM or DCMS consultation on future use of the spectrum, any proposed auctioning off of said spectrum or anything indicative of your claim being true?

Conscious of the fact you often selectively interpret these things I'd be grateful for a look myself.

Thanks in advance.

I did provide a link at the time. About 18 months ago, if I remember correctly.

Chris 02-03-2021 19:01

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36072699)
I did provide a link at the time. About 18 months ago, if I remember correctly.

As per, you trumped up a piece of off-the-cuff speculation into hard policy, if I remember correctly.

Link, or it’s not happening.

OLD BOY 02-03-2021 19:38

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36072703)
As per, you trumped up a piece of off-the-cuff speculation into hard policy, if I remember correctly.

Link, or it’s not happening.

It was a BBC document.

jfman 02-03-2021 19:39

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
I eagerly await the link to this silver bullet.

OLD BOY 02-03-2021 19:45

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36072707)
I eagerly await the link to this silver bullet.

I’m afraid I will have to leave that to you. I’m not trawling through thousands of posts just to please you, given that nothing would convince you anyway.

If you want to waste your evenings looking up stuff, knock yourself out.

jfman 02-03-2021 19:49

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36072711)
I’m afraid I will have to leave that to you. I’m not trawling through thousands of posts just to please you, given that nothing would convince you anyway.

If you want to waste your evenings looking up stuff, knock yourself out.

I can only presume no such evidence exists. A quick Google reveals nothing. Considering the move to digital only was almost twenty years in the making I find it hard to imagine there is no publicity, anywhere, of the BBC ceasing digital terrestrial transmissions in just six years time.

This leads me to conclude you imagined it.

Hugh 02-03-2021 19:57

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36072699)
I did provide a link at the time. About 18 months ago, if I remember correctly.

And it was refuted at the time...

From the Netflix/Streaming Services thread, 31/12/2019, 14:43 & 17:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36021674)
The BBC is planning for that eventuality - I mentioned this and provided my source some months ago. But of course, that doesn't suit your argument, so you ignore it. So, dream on, jfman, dream on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36021703)
Good friend of mine (known him since ‘94, worked with him twice in that time period) is a Network Technical Architect with the BBC (deeply involved in planning for the medium and long-term future for the BBC networks and transmission capabilities) disagrees with you...

He is currently involved (a small part if his job) in replacing 128Kb ISDN links (used for the Outside Broadcasting voice links) from football stadiums with 5G links - the ISDN links have been in place since the early 80s. The BBC sweats its assets, and doesn’t replace stuff because something "shiny" comes on stream.

The BBC put an options paper together, one of those options was no DTT, but that was in the "very unlikely" category...


Raider999 02-03-2021 20:00

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by chris (Post 36072664)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/20...adcast-channel



oh look, actual paid research, as opposed to the wishful thinking of some bored old geezer on the internet.


😂😂😂

jfman 02-03-2021 20:00

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
https://www.gov.uk/government/consul...tion-questions

Interestingly, despite this supposed done deal and the imminent demise of DTT in 2027, there's actually a public consultation on the future of DTT with an option of extending current licences to 2034.

1andrew1 02-03-2021 20:09

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36072685)
What's an aerial? ;)

You fool no one! :D

Hugh 02-03-2021 20:47

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36072718)
https://www.gov.uk/government/consul...tion-questions

Interestingly, despite this supposed done deal and the imminent demise of DTT in 2027, there's actually a public consultation on the future of DTT with an option of extending current licences to 2034.

From that report.

Quote:

The current DTT network that carries Freeview was built between 2007 and 2012 to replace the previous low power DTT network[footnote 4] that operated prior to digital switchover. It is forecast to have an effective usage until at least the early 2030s[footnote 5]. The Freeview platform remains popular with UK audiences because it is freely and widely available. It also supports a number of key policy outcomes which include:

a. Enabling reach of public service broadcasting (PSB): The DTT platform underpins the universal access requirements (to provide and ensure that services are available to all UK households) set out in PSB broadcasting licences and the BBC Charter and Agreement. The PSB multiplexes, including Multiplex 2, are required to reach 98.5% of UK households and currently these multiplexes provide 98.5% coverage across the UK. Data has shown that there is a higher level of viewing for PSB channels in ‘Freeview-only’ homes. Freeview continues to evolve to keep pace with changing technology and in 2015 introduced Freeview Play - a hybrid of live and on-demand services.

b. Greater choice for consumers: Freeview adds to the range of TV content services that cater to different consumer tastes and different means. There are approximately 11.3 million ‘Freeview-only’ households in the UK (c40% of all) and this category makes up the biggest proportion of all UK homes.[footnote 6] Freeview has a broad audience; however, in ‘Freeview-only’ households, its audience has traditionally been older and from lower socio-economic backgrounds compared to the audiences using pay platforms.

c. Contributing to competition in the TV market: Freeview is also important for competition in commercial television. A number of non-PSB channels rely on the DTT platform to support a wider reach; without it, these commercial services may become less financially viable, thereby limiting choice and plurality for households who cannot afford or do not want to subscribe to other content providers.
Footnote 5
Quote:

In its Future of Free to View TV report 2014 (p.32), Ofcom considered that “the on-going importance of DTT and barriers associated to IPTV availability and take up could make a DTT switch-off unlikely until at least 2030. In addition Ofcom’s 2018 report on Public Service Broadcasting in the digital age (p.13) states “Our analysis shows that the DTT platform will remain uncontested for free-to-air TV for at least the next ten years”.

jfman 02-03-2021 21:20

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Hugh I'm left to only assume that the UK Government publication is incorrect, despite being published in December 2020, in that they too must have missed the document/link/publication to which Old Boy referred to 18 months ago.

Now if only he could provide a link he could send it to the UK Government department responsible and the appropriate regulator OFCOM for they are clearly party to a widespread and ongoing deception of the British public by pretending broadcast television will continue in some form past 2027 on digital terrestrial.

1andrew1 02-03-2021 21:31

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36072748)
Hugh I'm left to only assume that the UK Government publication is incorrect, despite being published in December 2020, in that they too must have missed the document/link/publication to which Old Boy referred to 18 months ago.

Now if only he could provide a link he could send it to the UK Government department responsible and the appropriate regulator OFCOM for they are clearly party to a widespread and ongoing deception of the British public by pretending broadcast television will continue in some form past 2027 on digital terrestrial.

:LOL:

Hugh 02-03-2021 22:49

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Too late...

Quote:

The closing date and time for responses is 5pm on Friday 26 February 2021

OLD BOY 03-03-2021 09:31

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36072748)
Hugh I'm left to only assume that the UK Government publication is incorrect, despite being published in December 2020, in that they too must have missed the document/link/publication to which Old Boy referred to 18 months ago.

Now if only he could provide a link he could send it to the UK Government department responsible and the appropriate regulator OFCOM for they are clearly party to a widespread and ongoing deception of the British public by pretending broadcast television will continue in some form past 2027 on digital terrestrial.

I see no contradiction, jfman. The BBC document I was referring to talked about the BBC planning for internet only broadcasting by the mid-2030s. Hugh’s post seems to confirm that position.

Unless the government changes it’s position on this, I fully expect the 2027 review of the licence fee to require a move to a subscription model within the ensuing period.

jfman 03-03-2021 09:37

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36072795)
I see no contradiction, jfman. The BBC document I was referring to talked about the BBC planning for internet only broadcasting by the mid-2030s. Hugh’s post seems to confirm that position.

Unless the government changes it’s position on this, I fully expect the 2027 review of the licence fee to require a move to a subscription model within the ensuing period.

Link?

I see hypothetical scenarios. I don't see firm commitments.

Chris 03-03-2021 10:02

Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
 
Right, enough. Thanks to the BBC3 announcement we now have 3 different threads all discussing the same issue. I have closed all of them.

*All* pointless arguments about whether the future of TV is in linear broadcasting, video on-demand, a mixture of both, or something as-yet uninvented, should now take place here.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...php?t=33709854


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:32.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.