Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
Fourth horseman of the apocalypse due any second now... |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Considering BBC3 is aimed at a younger audience, younger audiences do not think "ooh, must be sat infront of the TV at 8pm"... That change has already happened. They do not even "record", they just catch it on iPlayer.
Why bring it back as a linear channel? Some of the younger generation do not even know that TV comes through an aerial, they think it comes from wifi. I would suggest it is more to justify the TV licence to the younger generation... "Oh look, we bought this back... aren't we great" |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
We see it with our eyes, we hear it with our ears, but some still do not get it. I don’t know if they ever will until these channels close down, as inevitably they will. The content will be there, the channel owners will be there, but all their stuff will be VOD. No-one in the future is going to want their lives dictated by scheduled television. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/20...adcast-channel
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
The Culture Minister is set on converting the licence fee to a subscription model, which will confound all those who deny vehemently that VOD is the future. https://www.tvbeurope.com/business/w...peed-broadband Despite having previously said scrapping the BBC’s licence fee is “politically impossible”, culture minister John Whittingdale has again mooted the idea that it could be axed when the current Royal Charter ends in 2027. Speaking in parliament, Whittingdale said the rise of the streamers and the fall in young viewers watching live BBC channels meant the licence fee was becoming harder to justify. Whittingdale added that the licence fee could not be scrapped “whilst a significant proportion of the population relies on Freeview” to watch the BBC. “The technology needs to be capable of delivering video on demand to everyone,” he added. “The technology does not allow it now. We will in a few years reach universal coverage and then it will be possible to introduce subscription services as an element of the funding.” Supporting the petition, Conservative MP Jonathan Gullis said: “I agreed the licence fee should be scrapped at the next Charter Review. The Government should also decriminalise non-payment.” |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Funny how the Culture Minister is set on becomes "mooting an idea" within a mere few lines.
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
It simply won’t work that way in the future. The advertisers would rather you didn’t fast forward through the adverts, of course! ---------- Post added at 16:45 ---------- Previous post was at 16:43 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
No it's your interpretation of what you think the Government will do in six years time. There's no manifesto commitment, no proposed legislation. Nothing but your hopes and dreams.
The 2025 broadband commitment is getting watered down so much the networks, particularly in rural areas, will not be up to it. Then you're goosed until 2037. Better get shifting those goalposts again OB. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
"Moot"
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
As you always express a contrary view, I guess I must be on the right lines. You have nothing to back up your view, as usual. ---------- Post added at 17:21 ---------- Previous post was at 17:19 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
I did, in the Times.
"could be" is not "will be", and "allow subscription funding of the BBC to be considered" is not "will be", no matter how much you try to spin it... https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/t...band-2c88wx9h5 Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Or as everyone else calls it, correct use of language.
You could be tall, handsome, and attractive to women, but you not necessarily will be... ;) One is definite, one is maybe... If I had a million pounds, I could buy a big house (maybe) If I had a million pounds, I would buy a big house (definite) See the difference? |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
Also any OFCOM or DCMS consultation on future use of the spectrum, any proposed auctioning off of said spectrum or anything indicative of your claim being true? Conscious of the fact you often selectively interpret these things I'd be grateful for a look myself. Thanks in advance. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
John Whittingdale MP said:" Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
Link, or it’s not happening. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
I eagerly await the link to this silver bullet.
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
If you want to waste your evenings looking up stuff, knock yourself out. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
This leads me to conclude you imagined it. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
From the Netflix/Streaming Services thread, 31/12/2019, 14:43 & 17:46 Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
😂😂😂 |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
https://www.gov.uk/government/consul...tion-questions
Interestingly, despite this supposed done deal and the imminent demise of DTT in 2027, there's actually a public consultation on the future of DTT with an option of extending current licences to 2034. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Hugh I'm left to only assume that the UK Government publication is incorrect, despite being published in December 2020, in that they too must have missed the document/link/publication to which Old Boy referred to 18 months ago.
Now if only he could provide a link he could send it to the UK Government department responsible and the appropriate regulator OFCOM for they are clearly party to a widespread and ongoing deception of the British public by pretending broadcast television will continue in some form past 2027 on digital terrestrial. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Too late...
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
Unless the government changes it’s position on this, I fully expect the 2027 review of the licence fee to require a move to a subscription model within the ensuing period. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
I see hypothetical scenarios. I don't see firm commitments. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Right, enough. Thanks to the BBC3 announcement we now have 3 different threads all discussing the same issue. I have closed all of them.
*All* pointless arguments about whether the future of TV is in linear broadcasting, video on-demand, a mixture of both, or something as-yet uninvented, should now take place here. https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...php?t=33709854 |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:32. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.