![]() |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
The point is, hospital admissions continue to decline and the NHS is coping. So why obsess about the figures? It’s pretty well over in this country, thanks to Boris. ---------- Post added at 20:13 ---------- Previous post was at 20:11 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
---------- Post added at 01:03 ---------- Previous post was at 01:03 ---------- Quote:
If you're going to worry about what you might have, you'll end up in a very deep hole, with lots of tin foil. :dig: |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
---------- Post added at 13:10 ---------- Previous post was at 13:01 ---------- The real problem here is that the science element of the Government decision making has been deprecated. I have seen no statement by Whitty et al, underwriting the current changes. What is more obscure is the knowledge and awareness on the current immunity curve. It would be good to clearly educate people how long their last booster might last to provide confidence in the decision making. |
Re: Coronavirus
Oops!
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
---------- Post added at 13:36 ---------- Previous post was at 13:34 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
They also like to give people warnings about smoking, drinking, 5 a day, red meat, exercise, chocolate, coffee, drugs, sunbathing etc etc . . . do we (as in the general public) really take notice? |
Re: Coronavirus
Sajid Javid unveils roll out of 4th Covid jab for over-75s and vulnerable adults across UK
https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...HS-news-update |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
I have a lot of time for Whitty and Vallance and the other scientists and what they think. But it is only one aspect of the response. Scientifically speaking, the best way to stop the virus spreading is still for everyone to stay at home. Yesterday's figure was just under 30k a day which is still a fairly significant amount, it was high for within the Delta outbreak, but looks low since we had much higher at the end of Dec/beginning of Jan, but then, we've had access to more testing than before since then. But everyone has had the offer of a vaccine, and aside for those with good reason not to take it, everyone either has or knows the risks of not doing it. They are never perfect and won't stop you getting covid or spreading it necessarily but they will usually prevent more severe outcomes. The general vaccinated population shouldn't be held back because of people not wanting a vaccine because someone on facebook said it has a 5g in it. But the scientists may well be aware of economic, social, etc effects of continuing restrictions but not necessarily have their focus on it nor be best placed to advise (yes I know CW has a PGDip in economics) because that job is primarily for cabinet to decide. |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
---------- Post added at 18:03 ---------- Previous post was at 17:57 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
The vulnerable are still vulnerable just as they were before Covid. The Covid jabs will be like flu jabs, updated for the current dominant strain, etc. It was never previously mandated that people with flu had to isolate; it was guidance. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:20. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.